It is about 12 years ago now that I attended an art class with some kids from Taiwan at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, California. I liked them, but what struck me the most in my interactions with them was a latent discomfort over whether we, here in the US, would be there for them if the going got tough with the Chinese. I think we have had a president in George W. Bush who has indicated we will be.
Nevertheless, it pains me to hear of stories coming out of Taiwan of rapprochement with the government in Beijing. What is a win-win outcome that allows a dictatorship in Beijing to perpetuate itself?
The Taiwanese have the right to choose their own course, but if they choose to sell their souls to Beijing with such offers as reduced tuition and whatever other inducements that a totalitarian government could make to them, over being a free people able to chart their own course, then my obligation to the Taiwanese, as an American, will be deemed paid in full.
To those kids back in Orange County, my statement is, "We will have done what we could, but good or bad the people of Taiwan will get the sort of government they deserve, if the Chinese thing is the choice they choose to make.
Steven Edwards
Palm Springs, California
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US