The members of the National Assembly have now been elected. Although the 23.36 percent voter turnout last Saturday was a historic low, the vote must be seen as a decisive victory for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), both of whom support constitutional reforms. Neither the direction nor the momentum of political reforms will be diminished. This indicates that while democracy in this country may still have its ups and downs, its foundations are solid.
The assembly has the task of ratifying the legislature's constitutional amendments. Because 83 percent of the vote was in favor of the DPP and the KMT, regardless of whether a simple, two-thirds or three-quarters majority is used as the standard for the assembly vote, the amendment bill will be ratified.
Long-term political goals, such as halving the number of legislative seats, adopting a "single-member district, two-vote" legislative electoral system, writing referendums into the Constitution, eliminating the National Assembly and others, will now be realized. As a result, this nation will have a better quality of legislator and elections will become better ordered affairs. Demagogues will gradually lose ground and the quality of the country's democracy will improve. With these elections, Taiwan's democracy has passed another milestone.
This election has also changed the political environment. With the introduction of a "single-member district, two-vote" system, the existence of small parties such as the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and the People First Party (PFP) are now under threat. So even though both signed agreements to support legislative reform last August, they now oppose it. This inconsistency is behind their poor performance in Saturday's elections.
Yesterday, the PFP legislative caucus slammed the door shut on cooperation with the government. This is no more than the party's death throes. The incessant changes in the PFP's political stance simply goes to show it turns whichever way the wind blows.
Now the legislature must pass a statute governing the assembly's exercise of power (
Nevertheless, the elections showed that regardless of which majority is used, the constitutional amendments will go ahead. In careful consideration of the legitimacy and appropriateness of future proposed constitutional amendments, a two-thirds majority is probably the more reasonable choice.
It is a matter of regret that the legitimacy of the amendments, regardless of what voting rules are adopted, will always be less than absolute because of the tiny turnout for the election. But this does not affect the legality of the elections, for not voting is also an expression of opinion and must be respected. The only reason that the PFP has called for a constitutional interpretation on this issue is because it performed so badly. Voters will have little sympathy for such thoughtless behavior.
This will be the final session of the National Assembly before it vanishes into history. Its agenda is very simple. It is required to ratify a bill to amend the Constitution, but cannot alter the substance of the amendments. How the members will vote has been largely decided by the parties and the voters. Therefore, this meeting of the assembly should be simple and efficient. The instigation of new political conflicts must be avoided. If things are kept simple, the whole assembly could be concluded within the week.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS