The World Health Assembly's (WHA) annual 10-day conference opens on Monday in Geneva. Once again, Taiwan is seeking observer status at the meeting. Although a communique signed by People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
Beijing remains unyielding on its "one China" principle. It has negotiated a memorandum of understanding with the WHO Secretariat to allow Taiwan to join the organization under the name "Taipei, China." It has also demanded that the WTO inform the Chinese authorities before Taipei works with the WHO on the implementation of the International Health Regulations.
Taiwan is an independent and sovereign country. China has no right to unilaterally negotiate with the WHO Secretariat on any issues regarding Taiwan. Nor is it in a position to decide anything for Taiwan. This country will not accept any attempt to belittle its status.
China's UN representative office in Geneva recently issued a diplomatic note citing a UN resolution stating that Taiwan, as part of China, is not qualified to become a WHO member state or a WHA observer. Beijing requested that all nations not to propose, sign or endorse any bill that is related to Taiwan and not to speak for Taiwan. This is totally contrary to Hu's statement in the communique.
The diplomatic note also stressed that Beijing has taken measures to facilitate exchanges between Taiwan and the WHO, and guarantees that Taiwan has free access to health information and technical assistance. What a pack of lies. Over the past two years, Taiwan has requested technical exchanges with the WHO 22 times -- 14 were rejected, five were never answered and three were endlessly delayed. These are the results of Beijing's obstruction.
Disease does not recognize borders. In the wake of the SARS epidemic and outbreaks of avian flu in this region, Taiwan not only should be part of an international disease-prevention organization, it can make valuable contributions to disease prevention around the world.
The medical profession in this country made considerable advances and is able to export its skills and experience to benefit others. The tsunami disaster-relief effort is an example. The government contributed US$50 million in aid, and the private sector US$100 million. Taiwan has also established the Taiwan International Health Operations Center to expand international medical cooperation and provide support for countries in need.
Participation in the WHO is about the human rights of the people of this country. The government has not linked participation to an acceptance of Taiwan's independence, two Chinas or "one China and one Taiwan." Seeking observer status is a bid to avoid political controversy. The government has adopted a flexible position on the name under which Taiwan participates in the organization as long as national dignity can be maintained. Involvement in the WHO is a purely practical request, and as long as Taiwan can directly and immediately participate in all WHO activities as a separate entity, the government is willing to consider all options.
The WHA meeting will be an opportunity to assess Hu's real attitude. Perhaps China will be true to its word and respect the wishes of Taiwan's people. If Taiwan fails to gain entry into the WHO because of interference from China, then there will be no further doubt about Beijing's hypocrisy. That would hopefully put an end to the current bout of "China fever."
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS