Amid an emergence of "China fever" sparked by the visits to China by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
While reiterating that "everything is under the government's control," Chen lashed out at former president Lee Teng-hui (
It is understandable that Chen wants to establish his legacy in the reminder of his second term. But that aside, what is more valuable is the style of leadership that he might leave for the country.
The art of leadership is to maintain sufficient forward momentum to control events and steer public policy without losing public support. An idealistic leader will not hesitate to do something that is unpopular. But a smart idealist will carefully measure pubic opinion before he does so and will develop a strategy to persuade the electorate.
Since Beijing has been taking advantage of pan-blue leaders' visits to promote its "one China" principle and the so-called "1992 consensus," Chen has introduced several strategies to set the limits for Lien and Soong.
The public response so far has been the result of a lack of effective and systemic handling of cross-strait interaction. It has not only generated growing pressures for the Chen administration, but has created uncertainty about the DPP's campaign for tomorrow's National Assembly election. Chen's leadership will be severely jeopardized if more prudence and patience are not incorporated. Chen stands at a critical historical juncture in terms of leading the country to bridge domestic divisions and the cross-strait divide, while at the same time safeguarding the nation's sovereignty, dignity and democratic achievements.
Defining Lien's and Soong's "journeys" as just a "prelude" to the eventual and necessary "government-to-government negotiations" between him and Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Confidence-building and domestic unity are key, given that the country is split by "China fever" versus "Taiwan first." But Chen must try to control the tempo of cross-strait dynamics.
What Chen needs right now is spin control and the ability to manipulate key issues. Persuasion and candid communication are two necessary mechanisms to educate the public on the seriousness of the situation and to eliminate confusion.
As a national leader, Chen should also understand there is a vital synergy between issues and image. Rather than a presidential stand on the issues creating a desired image, the desired image was first identified, then issues were selected based on how best to promote that new image. By throwing out key issues and creating a public arena for discussion, the president can control the pace and the extent of policy making based on the majority's opinions. Image has molded and directed the political agenda, not the other way around.
Chen must foresee the changes in Taiwanese society. As he lowered his voice, he raised his ratings. When he attempted to cross party lines to advocate a balanced resolution on essential social and economic legislation, he moved into the ascendancy. The pan-blue camp could not find any excuses to politicize such a moderate move. However, he must be seen to be consistent, not flip-flopping on issues.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS