The internationally acclaimed Vagina Monologues is basically about stopping violence against women (`Vagina' forum makes headway, April 24, page 4). However, when some would-be social do-gooders and entities along the likes of professors, educators, laws and other social institutions claim to be advancing and even protecting women's rights, they are in fact doing the opposite -- which is one of the reasons why The Vagina Monologues is on a global tour.
But some people are just not getting the message, rather merely taking in this "spectacle" as just another angry woman's female liberation campaign.
If women and girls are ashamed to talk about their vaginas it is certainly the culture in which they live that creates the ideology of this shamefulness, because, after all, men are measured by what they "have" and women by what they have not.
In Taiwan, for example, I have often heard male children, when playing with their classmates, exclaim "She doesn't have a `penis!'" -- although "penis" was not the word they used. Instead it was a derogatory term. And while the boys were laughing hysterically, the looks on the girls' faces said it all.
Sadness, anger and confusion. We see in Japan, for example, male fertility celebrations in which men carry long, phallic-shaped poles on their shoulders. But does anyone see women toting their vaginas on their shoulders? And in another language, "vagina" means "shame lips."
The famous statue of the little boy, Manneken Pis, which urinates into some pond or other, is seen in virtually every major park around the world. However, I have yet to see a squatting, or standing, female statue doing the same. "His" penis is visible; "her" vagina is not. Is it really any wonder women are afraid or ashamed to talk about their vaginas?
And when the public is being educated by those empowered to do so, we hear the same patriarchal tone time after time.
Lee Kuang-hui (李光輝), director of the psychiatry department at Peitou Armed Forces Hospital, says: "The most important work that can be done to prevent violence and sexual abuse is to educate women what to do in order to prevent rape or harassment."
What a truly sad thing to say! It is not the women who need to be educated. It is the men.
Again we see the responsibility of controlling men's sexual impulses being placed squarely on the shoulders of women. Historically, it has virtually always been the woman's responsibility to control a man's sexuality. In the Middle East we see women dressed perhaps too conservatively, all in order to prevent their male counterparts from becoming "aroused."
Chi Hui-jung (紀惠容), the chief executive officer of the Garden of Hope Foundation, completely misses the mark when she states, "I think it would be wonderful to have the `penis monologue,' which would allow men to share their stories and also raise their consciousness about their own bodies."
This statement is a direct slap to all women. Metaphorically, and in fact buried in our ideology, the entire world is run on phallic imagery -- Taipei 101, for instance. An erection proudly displayed in the center of a city that once was nothing but a lush "virgin" jungle, only to be "penetrated" and "unveiled" and ultimately conquered, because of man's fear of the "other." "Other" being nature and women.
Across the water we can see an angry man pointing his 700-plus penises at his supposed lost and wayward spouse -- "come back or I'll slap you!" His [China's] virility is being challenged by a self-actualizing Taiwan, and patriarchy can only stifle that.
One need only look at the society in which they live to take in the bigger picture of why they live in the world they do.
Kevin Larson
Chiayi City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers