Since 1996, many countries around the world have celebrated World Book Day on April 23. Cities organize outdoor stalls and bookshops set up stands and present discount promotions to encourage reading. Taiwan has organized such activities for a number of years.
Even though Taiwan is not a UN member, this UNESCO supported activity is celebrated locally. The tradition originated in Catalonia, Spain, and it subsequently obtained UN support and became an international event.
As part of the celebrations, the tradition in Barcelona is for men to give women a rose and for women to given men a book. This creative exchange of gifts is both romantic and educational, and now, on every April 23, in cities around the world the passion for reading is lit by a flower.
In Taiwan, the norm is to give away flowers and donate books, whereas in other cities around the world, it is the exchange of gifts of flowers and books between individuals that underline the significance of the event. The government's cultural and educational agencies have earmarked some money to make more of an event out of World Book Day, but unfortunately the response has been muted.
Compared to many other popular festivals related to food -- such as the annual Bluefin Tuna Cultural Festival -- World Book Day has for years played second fiddle. It has become an annual routine in form only and attracted little attention. Even if the culture and education agencies want to invigorate the event, it is unable to beat the public's passion for food.
This year's World Book Day marked the 10th anniversary of the event. Many cities overseas held activities to allow citizens to exchange roses and books as gifts. By accepting books as gifts, the people also experienced the beauty of the printed word in their hearts. How did Taiwan respond to such activities?
I heard from a radio news report that religious groups were participating in the event by giving away books to Chinese schools overseas. This development made me sigh with emotion. It's not that books should not be given as "relief," Nor do I mean that religious groups should not give away books on this day. Rather, I was shocked that Taiwan was actually incapable of properly hosting a significant event like World Book Day.
Taiwan has expressed a strong desire to join the UN. Should we be worried that an activity such as World Book Day, which is sponsored by UNESCO, in a country like ours with reasonable economic and political development, should present such a disappointment? We have many so-called "cultural" activities. However, we have turned World Book Day from the exchanges of flowers and books into relief delivery. What happened to our culture and the culture of reading?
World Book Day has lost its significance in Taiwan. The slogan of aiming at building a cultural state is often used in politics. But viewed from the quality and quantity of culture in Taiwan's society, we know that the nation is not a cultural state at all. More Taiwanese people put greater weight on "money" than "meaning." However, such weight is actually weightless, and it will not cause other countries in the world to take us seriously.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew and Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US