These days, you can tell a true Taiwan sophisticate by whether or not they have received an invitation from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to visit China.
Everyone is excited about the fact that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
For instance, when I am invited to Beijing to have a tete-a-tete with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), I can be relied upon to sign a "10-point agreement" that will absolutely be to the advantage of the people of Taiwan.
Apparently, Lien and Soong have received personal invitations from the CCP to travel to Beijing and meet with Hu. Although I have not yet received such an invitation, it is clear that this is merely an administrative oversight by our good friends in Zhongnanhai, and that my invitation will be forthcoming shortly.
Now, understandably, I am not nearly as influential as either of the two opposition leaders. However, I would like to point out that regardless of the importance of the agreements that Lien or Soong may sign in China, these two individuals can hardly compete with me in terms of the concessions they are willing to make in the interest of cross-strait peace.
Should I be called upon -- or rather, when I am called upon -- to sign an agreement with Beijing, I would like to state categorically that I will defend and promote the interests of Taiwan at every opportunity.
For example, when I meet with Hu -- or "JT-Baby," as I like to call him -- I will guarantee that:
First, it will be illegal for certain individuals to talk about Taiwan's independence. Specifically, all taxi drivers shall be required to stop talking about independence. In fact, I shall make it mandatory for taxi drivers to stop talking about politics altogether.
Let me go further. As a demonstration of Taiwan's goodwill, it will be illegal for taxi drivers to speak entirely, except to acknowledge direct questions about their passengers' destination.
Second, I am willing to concede to the authorities in Beijing the right to use "non-peaceful means" against any individual or group who disobeys traffic laws in Taiwan. Especially taxi drivers. This can include the employment of the Second Artillery Corps' missiles to enforce the agreement, if necessary.
Third, to protect the interests of Taiwanese businesspeople with investments in China, I will guarantee a healthy tax exemption to all businesspeople who contribute to a special "Cross-Strait Peace Promotion Fund" which, for the sake of administrative clarity, will be established in my name. Thirty percent of all funds remitted to this account will be given to the appropriate CCP officials to ensure smooth sailing for Taiwanese businesspeople.
Fourth, a special cross-strait exchange foundation will be established which will allow single, attractive 18-to-30-year-olds to travel from Taiwan to China or vice versa for one-on-one negotiations with a select group of individuals, to be determined by the signatories of this agreement.
Fifth, Chinese officials will no longer refer to their Taiwanese counterparts as "Taiwan splittists" or "Taiwan authorities," but rather as "Taiwan's leaders" or "Taiwan's leadership." To reciprocate this change, Taiwanese will no longer refer to their counterparts as "Communist bandits" or "bloodsucking authoritarian bastards."
Sixth, direct cross-strait cargo flights shall be allowed without restriction, so long as each carrier contributes NT$3 million to the aforementioned "Cross-Strait Peace Promotion" Fund.
Seventh, direct cross-strait passenger flights shall be allowed in the interests of serving Article 4 of this declaration.
Eighth, Taiwanese companies shall be permitted to build as many factories and make as many investments in China as they see fit, so long as 100 percent of their profits shall be remitted to Taiwan. Chinese companies shall also be permitted to remit 100 percent of their profits to Taiwan.
Ninth, all Chinese officials shall be allowed to travel to Taiwan at will, so long as their criminal history is deemed satisfactory by law enforcement authorities. To reciprocate, all Taiwanese officials may travel to China at their will, so long as their psychological histories are deemed satisfactory by mental health authorities.
Tenth, in keeping with its moves towards establishing a free-market economy, China shall abolish its "one China" principle and adopt a "one market" principle. For its part, Taiwan will throw aside former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Clearly, non-official diplomacy has its utility, and the people of Taiwan deserve a chance to let their voice be heard. Therefore, let the government cast aside its reservations and open its arms to the opportunity it now has before it. Let me sign a 10-point agreement.
Mac William Bishop is a journalist based in Taipei. Comments may be directed to mwbtaiwan@hotmail.com.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US