In some regards, it is a dangerous world. A tsunami hit southeastern Asia just several months ago, claiming the lives of hundreds of thousands of people; in less than a month, several severe earthquakes have struck Japan.
Nature has shown a cruel face, but nothing could be bloodier and more brutal than our internecine wars.
Never forget that we can hardly find innocent people on earth. Is there any nation or ethnic group that is qualified to claim that neither they nor their forefathers had anything to do with invasions? In cases where no apology has yet been made, we do owe it to each other to say, "I'm so sorry."
That's what I felt when I saw huge anti-Japanese demonstrations erupting in China again. The protesters complained of Japan's use of cunning descriptions to disguise its war crimes in textbooks, and demanded apologies. I've been hearing the Chinese asking for an apology from Japan ever since I was very young. The Japanese have apologized, in delicate diplomatic language, but also in abundant official development assistance. However, it seems the Chinese are never satisfied. Itself a repeat offender, China is always demanding one more apology.
How can China deny that its people have been involved in repeated invasions? Everyone knows the ancient Chinese lived in a relatively small area along the Yellow River. Is China going to tell us that all its current territories have been annexed peacefully?
It is easy to find examples in history books of Chinese troops crossing the border, conquering and slaughtering. The descendants of the victims have spread over almost all of east and central Asia, even Europe, depending on your definition of "China" and which purported Chinese dynasty is part of Chinese history and which is not.
China does owe apologies to a lot of nations. The Chinese are also covering up their forefathers' war crimes in their own textbooks. China has never offered any official development assistance to anyone as a form of apology.
Why is the repeat offender, China, always demanding an apology from Japan without even mentioning its saber-rattling toward Taiwan?
Lau Seng-hian
Taipei County
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past