Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) is expected to make a visit to China by the end of this month. It is truly sad to see the KMT and Lien stubbornly proceeding with the trip, disregarding repeated warnings about its bad timing and the potential harm to the nation's interests.
What does Lien realistically hope to accomplish with his trip? One cannot help but wonder. KMT Vice Chairman Chiang Pin-kun (
After that trip, Chen Shui-bian's (
On Friday, both Premier Frank Hsieh (
Perhaps the KMT thought that, since the pan-blue camp has a legislative majority, it could forcibly enact into law any agreement it reaches with Beijing. That only goes to show what little respect the KMT has for the law and the government. As with any other country in the world, only the executive branch of the government is empowered and authorized to negotiate and enter into agreement with other governments and countries.
Even Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had to admit yesterday that the likelihood of Lien signing an agreement to formally end the civil war between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is small, because government approval would be required.
It's true that the KMT and CCP signed various pacts and agreements during the Chinese Civil War, before the KMT went into exile in Taiwan. But it must be remembered that the KMT was not just a political party, but the nominal ruling regime in China. So it had the capacity to enter into such agreements with the CCP, which was then considered by the KMT a "rebel" group. The problem is that the KMT seems unwilling -- and perhaps unable -- to accept the reality that it is now just an opposition party in Taiwan.
Lien has reportedly agreed to speak with President Chen on the phone before his trip, despite the fact that Chen asked to meet with him personally. Perhaps the KMT is hoping that a phone conservation will give Lien the needed authorization, or at least the appearance of it.
The DPP government must not be pressured by Lien into authorizing him to accept terms and conditions that the government isn't ready to accept. After the passage of the "Anti-Secession" Law, extreme caution must be taken when dealing with cross-strait affairs.
Without authorization from the Taiwan government to accept terms and conditions on its behalf, and without the ability to make concessions to Beijing, one can hardly imagine what constructive purpose Lien's trip will serve. Perhaps Lien believes that he can woo the CCP into unilaterally withdrawing all the missiles targeting Taiwan, and promising to never again re-deploy them against Taiwan.
If that is the case, then he's deluding himself even more than usual. And if his sole purpose is to have tea with Chinese officials, then the trip is utterly meaningless.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past