Last Tuesday, President Chen-Shui-bian (
The meeting concluded with a seven-point consensus stipulating that the government should try to stem the recent outbreak of China fever. In order to do so, the government would not shy away from a tough approach, including taking legal action against Chiang. As a result, the KMT decided to terminate negotiations with the government.
The recent wave of China fever began with the February summit between Chen and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
Most of the points in the Chen-Soong agreement dealing with cross-strait relations, national security and ethnic relations have come to naught. There is still no chance of the arms procurement bill being brought before the legislature for review. Despite Soong's goodwill efforts, the PFP efforts to restrict the government continue unabated. The relationship between ethnic groups, the government and opposition is still as tense as it was before the February meeting.
As a result of the Chen-Soong agreement, the president has retreated to the "one China under the constitution" position for defining Taiwan's national status. This drew attacks from the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and other pro-independence groups, while China completely ignored it. The goodwill extended by the Chen administration to China has triggered a "policy competition" between Taiwan's ruling and opposition parties. The 10-point agreement between Chiang and Chen Yunlin has reduced the pressure that Taipei and the international community put on Beijing after the enactment of Anti-Secession Law.
Future visits to China by Soong and KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
There may be another meeting between Chen and Soong in the next few days. Perhaps it is time that Lien is invited for talks between government and opposition, and that the 10-point agreement is reviewed. Such a review does not imply overturning the agreement. Rather, it could be a pragmatic amendment of the empty phrases in the agreement, and a redefinition of the topics in order to create a feasible plan for national security and the cross-strait relationship.
The PFP dances around, saying that a strong national defense is the only way to guarantee peace in the Taiwan Strait yet continuing to boycott the arms budget and reaching agreements that it refuses to implement. If the PFP feel that the arms purchase isn't a matter of national interest, they should say so outright and come up with their own national security plan that could be reviewed in the legislature.
Beijing appears to be getting more flexible in its carrot-stick approaches to Taiwan, while government and opposition in this country have their own delusory China fever. This will only lead to more Chinese attempts to manipulate Taiwan's domestic contradictions. The government must cool the current bout of China fever to stop both Beijing and the opposition from going out of control. Only if there is a difference between government and opposition enthusiasm will there be room for negotiation. If not, Taiwan's hard-won foundation will be all but destroyed by the opposition's frenzied efforts to take the initiative.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers