As the world mourns the death of Pope John Paul II, Beijing's conduct has indeed been both rude and shameful, showing no respect for the beloved world religious leader. China cannot win respect with its military might or its potentially lucrative market. It will only earn genuine respect from other world powers when it begins to learn some manners.
More than two hundred representatives from all over the world, including President Chen Shui-bian (
Yet the Chinese government chose to boycott the event. It wasn't enough that China was almost the only country in the world that did not send delegates to attend the Pope's funeral on Friday. In fact, in China, where all the media are owned and controlled by the state, there were no broadcasts and virtually no coverage at all of the funeral. The government-run Xinhua News Agency dedicated a total of 96 words to the Pope's funeral, followed by a story that dedicated all of its roughly 400 words to condemning President Chen's attendance at the funeral as a "splittist activity" and as practicing "two Chinas" and "one China and one Taiwan."
Leaving aside Beijing's rudeness, it's just hard to see any justification for condemning Chen's attendance. After all, Taiwan and the Vatican maintain formal diplomatic relations. It is entirely appropriate for the Vatican to send a funeral invitation to the Taiwan government. Since the Vatican is Taiwan's only European ally, it was imperative that Chen personally attend and pay his respects to the Pope.
Pope John Paul II was the leader of one of the most influential and oldest religions of the world, whose followers cross all national boundaries. Attending his funeral was much more than a political statement for Chen. While it was indeed encouraging for the Taiwanese people to see their president sit alongside other prominent world leaders and be accorded a high level of diplomatic treatment at the Vatican, Chen's attendance had a humanitarian significance as well. It was a gesture of respect and an embrace of the universal values exalted by the Pope and the Catholic religion. As indicated by Chen in a speech at the Vatican, "love, courage, peace, and reconciliation" -- the four pillars emphasized by the Pope before his death -- are needed in order to break through the cross-strait impasse.
But it takes two to tango. Beijing seems to be completely uninterested in the values that the Pope stood for. China remains notorious for its systematic violation of human rights. It shows absolutely no intention of respecting freedom of religion. In fact, Beijing still cracks down regularly on the underground Catholic church, arresting priests and harassing worshippers.
For years there has been talk about the possibility of a resumption of diplomatic ties between the Vatican and Beijing. Of course, the Chinese government has adamantly insisted that the Vatican sever diplomatic tie with Taiwan first. And there is at least one other issue that keeps the two from resuming ties, namely, Beijing's insistence on naming Catholic bishops without so-called "interference" from the Vatican. Hopefully, the Vatican has seen for itself that China's behavior is incompatible with core Catholic values -- and that discarding ties with Taiwan to establish them with China is just not worth it.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS