The official royal wedding tankards have gone on sale, the special postal stamps are ready for issue.
But the mugs fail to show the faces of the bride and groom. They portray instead two interlinked C's -- for Charles and Camilla.
The image is copied from a pair of gold cufflinks Camilla gave Charles more than 20 years ago -- and which he wore on his honeymoon with Princess Diana in 1981.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
The special stamps, many Britons have vowed, will be stuck on envelopes upside down in protest at the civil wedding on April 8.
There is something odd about the spring wedding of Prince Charles, 56-year-old heir to the British throne, to his mistress of 34 years, Camilla Parker Bowles.
The quiet acknowledgement, indifference, teasing and hostility that has greeted the decision by Prince Charles to marry 57-year-old Parker Bowles, has become a barometer of the relationship between the monarchy and its subjects.
"The whole affair illustrates the disjointed relationship between the monarchy and the public in the 21st century", one royal observer said.
The blunders and compromises required to circumvent the intricacies of etiquette, religion and procedure for a royal marriage between two divorcees have caused some to dismiss it as a soap opera.
"The royal family still has a special religious and constitutional position, but it also stars in a kind of low comedy played out in the media to general amusement or outrage," one BBC commentator said.
The British public, known for its sense of fairness, has in its majority, given the couple its blessing.
The lack of obvious enthusiasm is rooted, perhaps understandably, in deep-seated affection for the late Princess Diana and the role Prince Charles' affair with Camilla played in the breakdown of her marriage to Charles nine years ago.
Comparisons are inevitably made, and on that score, Charles and Camilla have a distinct advantage.
"Second marriages, even royal ones, are never the same," commented the Wall Street Journal. In this case, and as far as comparisons go, the ages and looks of the protagonists tend to count against them.
Perhaps the most pressing question on the mind of Britons is what Charles sees in Camilla, and why he decided to take the plunge now.
For the timing there is no simple answer -- except, since the announcement was made on Feb. 10, Charles has appeared a greatly relieved and happier man.
Ever since Charles met Camilla Shand at a polo match at Windsor in 1970, the two have conducted a passionate affair.
They married other partners, enduring the ignominy of scandal and the humiliation of a clandestine relationship.
And yet, relations between the two families were always close.
Soon after Andrew Parker Bowles, a dashing courtier and commander of the Household Cavalry, married Camilla in 1973, he remarked about Charles: "His Royal Highness seems awfully fond of my wife."
A year later, Prince Charles was made the godfather of the Parker Bowles' first child, Tom. Now 30, Tom will be a witness at his mother's wedding to the prince.
Royal observers believe that Charles, perceived by many as weak, over-sensitive and eccentric, received from Camilla the love and affirmation of his personality that his parents, and the young Diana, had failed to convey.
"I do love you, I'm so proud of you," Camilla revealed on the infamous "Camillagate tapes" that also offered a glimpse of the couple's intimate sexual relationship.
"Your greatest achievement is to love me," replied Charles in the conversation that allegedly took place in December, 1989. The tapes were published in 1993.
In the seven-and-half years since the tragic death of Princess Diana in Paris, Camilla's influence over Charles has steadily, and quietly, grown.
Insiders report that Camilla, since she moved into her own apartment in Charles' London palace, Clarence House, two years ago, has increasingly become the power behind the throne.
Gradually, her looks and appearance, said by her most scathing critics to be resembling the "back end of a Bedford bus," are improving.
Like Diana before her, Camilla now has a range of her favorite designers at her beck and call.
The most intriguing question remains how the wedlock between Charles and Camilla will affect, in the longer term, the British monarchy, at home and in the 53 Commonwealth countries.
The British public have stated, in their overwhelming majority, that they do not wish Camilla to be called queen.
Taking account of these sensitivities, she will be known as "Princess Consort" when Charles accedes to the throne.
In reality, however, she will be "queen in all but name," as one leading politician put it.
For the time being, the nation is quietly hoping that Queen Elizabeth II, now 78 and in rude good health, will be at the helm long enough to keep the monarchy on a steady course.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers