The official royal wedding tankards have gone on sale, the special postal stamps are ready for issue.
But the mugs fail to show the faces of the bride and groom. They portray instead two interlinked C's -- for Charles and Camilla.
The image is copied from a pair of gold cufflinks Camilla gave Charles more than 20 years ago -- and which he wore on his honeymoon with Princess Diana in 1981.
The special stamps, many Britons have vowed, will be stuck on envelopes upside down in protest at the civil wedding on April 8.
There is something odd about the spring wedding of Prince Charles, 56-year-old heir to the British throne, to his mistress of 34 years, Camilla Parker Bowles.
The quiet acknowledgement, indifference, teasing and hostility that has greeted the decision by Prince Charles to marry 57-year-old Parker Bowles, has become a barometer of the relationship between the monarchy and its subjects.
"The whole affair illustrates the disjointed relationship between the monarchy and the public in the 21st century", one royal observer said.
The blunders and compromises required to circumvent the intricacies of etiquette, religion and procedure for a royal marriage between two divorcees have caused some to dismiss it as a soap opera.
"The royal family still has a special religious and constitutional position, but it also stars in a kind of low comedy played out in the media to general amusement or outrage," one BBC commentator said.
The British public, known for its sense of fairness, has in its majority, given the couple its blessing.
The lack of obvious enthusiasm is rooted, perhaps understandably, in deep-seated affection for the late Princess Diana and the role Prince Charles' affair with Camilla played in the breakdown of her marriage to Charles nine years ago.
Comparisons are inevitably made, and on that score, Charles and Camilla have a distinct advantage.
"Second marriages, even royal ones, are never the same," commented the Wall Street Journal. In this case, and as far as comparisons go, the ages and looks of the protagonists tend to count against them.
Perhaps the most pressing question on the mind of Britons is what Charles sees in Camilla, and why he decided to take the plunge now.
For the timing there is no simple answer -- except, since the announcement was made on Feb. 10, Charles has appeared a greatly relieved and happier man.
Ever since Charles met Camilla Shand at a polo match at Windsor in 1970, the two have conducted a passionate affair.
They married other partners, enduring the ignominy of scandal and the humiliation of a clandestine relationship.
And yet, relations between the two families were always close.
Soon after Andrew Parker Bowles, a dashing courtier and commander of the Household Cavalry, married Camilla in 1973, he remarked about Charles: "His Royal Highness seems awfully fond of my wife."
A year later, Prince Charles was made the godfather of the Parker Bowles' first child, Tom. Now 30, Tom will be a witness at his mother's wedding to the prince.
Royal observers believe that Charles, perceived by many as weak, over-sensitive and eccentric, received from Camilla the love and affirmation of his personality that his parents, and the young Diana, had failed to convey.
"I do love you, I'm so proud of you," Camilla revealed on the infamous "Camillagate tapes" that also offered a glimpse of the couple's intimate sexual relationship.
RSS