Under the intense gaze of the Taiwanese people, the meeting between President Chen Shui-bian (
Also, the legislature is controlled by the opposition, and believing that a name change could be passed would be to cheat both oneself and others. The language was clear, and Chen's compromise and retreat could be seen in his statements and actions, which amounted to accepting Soong's "one China" framework and pro-unification stance.
The immediate response from pro-independence Taiwanese both in Taiwan and abroad who think that the national title should be changed and a new constitution written was surprise and protest followed by public anger and attacks. Chen was taken aback.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) said Chen had been taken by the demon he wanted to gain control of, that he lost his presidential stature by issuing a joint statement with Soong and that any comparison with his appointment of General Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) as premier was "crazy."
Senior presidential adviser Koo Kuang-ming (辜寬敏) resigned from his post in protest. National Policy Adviser and Chairman of World United Formosans for Independence Ng Chiau-tong (黃昭堂) said the consensus was nonsense. He said independence supporters had now been cheated by Chen three times, and that they would follow their own road from this point forward to avoid being cheated again.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) issued a statement criticizing Chen for abandoning nation-building for the sake of reconciliation, saying it amounted to admitting defeat. TSU legislative caucus whip Lo Chih-ming (羅志明) said that "the joint statement means capitulating to the unificationists and giving into the `one China' concept." The party's Secretary-General Chen Chien-ming (陳建銘) said he felt "deceived," and that Chen is "a president who goes back on his promises."
Huang Chao-hung (黃昭弘), an elder in the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan, said that Chen offered Soong his sincerity in the form of a calligraphy painting, and wondered whether Chen "is sincere toward the people of Taiwan." But the best assessment came from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), when he said that "I even thought it was a KMT announcement.
The departure of stalwarts of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and other prominent figures has been a sharp warning to Chen and had a huge impact on the DPP. It has become a major problem, but these people are all intelligent political leaders who understand the overall picture.
If Chen patiently and sincerely explains his actions, there should still be a chance to save the situation. The heart of the problem is that -- ?beginning with the 228 Incident, through the "white terror" period and the tang wai movement, to the DPP's and Chen's accession to power -- the people of Taiwan have moved from a minority to a majority position politically, and from distrust and doubt to belief in and protection of Taiwan. They have come to understand, accept and support the idea that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country, that the national title should be changed, and that a new constitution should be written.
Already, a majority of the Taiwanese people -- ?if not 75 percent then almost 60 percent -- accept and identify with these ideas, and many feel that no one but Chen should lead them toward the realization of this vision.
How cruel and how wrong it was of Chen to crush this dream of the Taiwanese people in his meeting with Soong.
Will they believe in Chen again, and will they believe in and vote for the DPP again?
Over the past few days, we have heard a lot of accusations and expressions of disappointment with Chen and the DPP, both within Taiwan and from abroad. The public is turning its back and supporters are walking away.
Chen danced with the wolf-like Soong in an attempt to build a legislative majority, pass the arms purchase and constitutional reform bills and achieve a breakthrough in the tense cross-strait relationship. In power politics, a risky gambit may win the game.
The problem is that Taiwan still isn't a regular democratic state. Sacrificing the principle of national sovereignty in the name of power politics is too high a price. Can Chen afford to pay it? This time, he clearly misread public opinion and forgot that it can either make or break him.
If he doesn't quickly do some damage control and return to the road toward Taiwanese sovereignty, Chen will lose this game and I predict that the DPP will be the loser in this year's National Assembly, county commissioner and city mayor elections, as well as the Kaohsiung mayoral election next year and even the presidential election in 2008.
Chiou Chwei-liang is a visiting professor at Tamkang University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
RSS