Following the Chen-Soong summit, many pro-independence heavyweights feel they were duped, or even betrayed and double-crossed. Although they may not have any concrete criticism of the 10-point agreement reached by both President Chen Shui-bian (
Seeing the leaders of both camps reconcile and embrace, they suddenly felt that they had been fooled -- a very natural reaction.
Before, Chen dare not speak to the public about the reality of the situation in China and the international community toward Taiwan's independence. But now, he has turned around and is criticizing others for deceiving themselves. The 180-degree change in Chen's attitude is hard to commend.
The consensus reached by Chen and Soong is just a return to the fundamentals of the problem facing the nation, which is hardly surprising. Issues regarding how the Republic of China (ROC) is defined, constitutional reform and cross-strait relations have been discussed so many times.
But it seems that this consensus is only now being taken seriously. As a result, some have panicked while others have overreacted.
Political power distorts one's personality and image. This is also true of both Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Over the past four years, Chen has taken the initiative to push all sorts of causes, and has tested all sorts of limits. He has played the role of a reformer or pioneer, and has placed himself on the front lines of the causes he wishes to promote.
As a result, the opposition party has behaved like a conservative governing party, while the governing party has behaved like a radical opposition party.
The party that was supposed to be focusing its attention on managing the country behaved as if it was engaging in a social movement, while those active in social movements behaved as if they were running the country with the government.
In addition, former president Lee Teng-hui (
This type of blurring of roles should not have happened in democratic politics.
In democratic politics, each political party has a role to play. These roles are confused if one demands that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) continue to play the role of tangwai (outside the KMT).
The dark-green Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), meanwhile, should distance itself from the DPP in order to exert a deeper influence in Taiwan, while the DPP should only focus on implementing the consensus already reached by our society.
The "deep-green" backlash to the 10-point consensus reached by Chen and Soong is going to have a substantial impact on the legislature and the year-end county commissioner elections, and thus Chen might have a better chance to follow a "middle of the road" approach to govern the nation. However, the PFP's actions in the legislature and the prospects for a cross-strait detente will also have an impact on the development of the inter-party reconciliation.
Chen does not have much time to waste. The clock is ticking. With Premier Frank Hsieh (
Antonio Chiang is a former deputy secretary-general to the National Security Council.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath