The meeting between President Chen Shui-bian (
Before the meeting, Chen presented a gift to Soong. Inscribed on it was the Chinese characters for "sincerity." In response to Chen's courtesy, Soong gave the president a colored glass snail and made some polite remarks. But reading between the lines, we can assume "those who came were not friendly; those who are friendly did not come."
After the meeting, Chen and Soong signed a 10-point consensus. In the statement, the president acknowledges the status of the Republic of China (ROC) and commits not to declaring independence, change the national title, push the "state-to-state" dictum in the ROC Constitution or launch a referendum on the unification-independence issue. The statement leaves Taiwan entangled with the ROC, and the ROC with the People's Republic of China. His commitment has confused the international community, and has placated the pan-blue camp. But it was a slap in the face of those who wish to change the nation's name and create a new constitution.
As for the proposed direct cargo flights, following up on the "successful model of the chartered passenger flights" during the Lunar New Year, what is the definition of "successful" anyway? From the aspect of opening commercial routes across the Strait, the model was certainly successful. But, from the aspect of effective management, the model failed, as foreign maids and tour groups were also allowed to board the flights intended for Taiwanese businesspeople alone.
After the legislative elections in December, the PFP lost 12 seats, the poorest performance of any party. But as the situation changes, the DPP has been flirting with the PFP to lure it over to its side, while the KMT is also casting friendly glances at its pan-blue ally. So the party is gaining advantage from both sides. The meeting with Chen boosted Soong's value even more.
Although KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
But it is absolutely appropriate for the pan-green camp's supporters to advise Chen with Lien's words.
What did Chen gain from the meeting? Undoubtedly, his campaign promise of making a new constitution by 2006 and implementing it by 2008 will not be carried out. What did he gain in exchange for showing his goodwill by admitting that the ROC is in fact the "greatest common denominator" for the two sides of the Taiwan Strait? Only Soong's self-satisfied claim that independence is not an option.
I do not intend to blame Soong, because he has not changed. He has not altered his ideals opposing independence or promoting unification under the "one China" roof. What has changed is Chen, who has turned from a promoter of national title rectification and a new constitution into a protector of the ROC.
The meeting cruelly shows that Chen is leaning towards Soong, while Soong is leaning towards the ROC. Through the meeting, the ROC has become the biggest winner while Taiwan has become the biggest loser.
Pathetically, the winner is still a loser unable to go its own way in the world.
Chang Kuo-tsai is vice secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors. TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS