The meeting between President Chen Shui-bian (
Before the meeting, Chen presented a gift to Soong. Inscribed on it was the Chinese characters for "sincerity." In response to Chen's courtesy, Soong gave the president a colored glass snail and made some polite remarks. But reading between the lines, we can assume "those who came were not friendly; those who are friendly did not come."
After the meeting, Chen and Soong signed a 10-point consensus. In the statement, the president acknowledges the status of the Republic of China (ROC) and commits not to declaring independence, change the national title, push the "state-to-state" dictum in the ROC Constitution or launch a referendum on the unification-independence issue. The statement leaves Taiwan entangled with the ROC, and the ROC with the People's Republic of China. His commitment has confused the international community, and has placated the pan-blue camp. But it was a slap in the face of those who wish to change the nation's name and create a new constitution.
As for the proposed direct cargo flights, following up on the "successful model of the chartered passenger flights" during the Lunar New Year, what is the definition of "successful" anyway? From the aspect of opening commercial routes across the Strait, the model was certainly successful. But, from the aspect of effective management, the model failed, as foreign maids and tour groups were also allowed to board the flights intended for Taiwanese businesspeople alone.
After the legislative elections in December, the PFP lost 12 seats, the poorest performance of any party. But as the situation changes, the DPP has been flirting with the PFP to lure it over to its side, while the KMT is also casting friendly glances at its pan-blue ally. So the party is gaining advantage from both sides. The meeting with Chen boosted Soong's value even more.
Although KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
But it is absolutely appropriate for the pan-green camp's supporters to advise Chen with Lien's words.
What did Chen gain from the meeting? Undoubtedly, his campaign promise of making a new constitution by 2006 and implementing it by 2008 will not be carried out. What did he gain in exchange for showing his goodwill by admitting that the ROC is in fact the "greatest common denominator" for the two sides of the Taiwan Strait? Only Soong's self-satisfied claim that independence is not an option.
I do not intend to blame Soong, because he has not changed. He has not altered his ideals opposing independence or promoting unification under the "one China" roof. What has changed is Chen, who has turned from a promoter of national title rectification and a new constitution into a protector of the ROC.
The meeting cruelly shows that Chen is leaning towards Soong, while Soong is leaning towards the ROC. Through the meeting, the ROC has become the biggest winner while Taiwan has become the biggest loser.
Pathetically, the winner is still a loser unable to go its own way in the world.
Chang Kuo-tsai is vice secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors. TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS