The "deep green" backlash to the 10-point consensus reached between President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) continues. A split between Chen and the rump of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), on the one hand, and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) on the other, seems inevitable unless Chen makes a sincere and immediate effort to account for himself.
Four senior figures in the pro-independence group -- Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏), Wu Li-pei (吳澧培), Ng Chiau-tong (黃昭堂) and Alice King (金美齡) -- have submitted resignations from their posts as presidential advisors, though Wu has had second thoughts.
Even within the DPP, severe criticism has accompanied the signing of the accord. DPP Legislator Wang Sing-nan (
While Chen personally may not have much to lose, since he will most likely never again run for public office, the same cannot be said about his party.
Yesterday, for example, the chairman of the DPP's Sanchong headquarters, Tung King-hsing (董金興), resigned from the party and said he would join the TSU. It is no secret that Sanchong has a large number of DPP supporters: In December's legislative elections the city contributed more than 100,000 votes to the DPP. Tung said he couldn't stand the pressure and outrage from the grassroots any longer.
This raises the question of whether the DPP's performance in the upcoming mayor and county commissioner elections will suffer as a result.
Chen's behavior in the face of criticism from the pro-independence camp has not helped things. His remarks during a videoconference with members of the European Parliament, in particular, have only increased the anger of the "deep greens." Comments that he would not change the national title during his final term and that Lee would not be able to do so either, were he still in office, are two examples of this.
Equally inflammatory was his description of the campaign to change the title of this country as "delusional."
Chen does not seem to understand the reason for the outrage. As Lee said both before and after Chen's meeting with Soong, reconciliation with the PFP is something to be encouraged. However, what is the point of reconciliation if one's soul and core values are abandoned?
Had Chen always been as "pragmatic" as he is today, he would not have come as far as he has. It is very difficult to believe that Chen became the "pragmatic" man that he is overnight. Does this mean that during the latest legislative and presidential election campaigns when Chen trumpeted these ideals, he never once believed they could be accomplished while he was in office?
There is another question that Chen should keep in mind. If he does not patch things up with the "deep greens," then where will he turn -- who will give him the time of day -- if the agreement with the PFP falls apart?
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS