On Dec. 10, Japan approved defense guidelines for the next 10 years -- the National Defense Program Guideline for Fiscal Year 2005 and After. Regarding China and Taiwan, the document particularly noted that "China continues to modernize its nuclear forces and missile capabilities as well as its naval and air forces. It is also expanding its area of operation at sea. We will have to remain attentive to its future actions."
A month before the guideline was approved, a Chinese nuclear-powered submarine was discovered in Japan's waters south of Okinawa. Disputes between China and Japan have also included oil pipelines in Siberia, the exploration of natural-gas fields in the East China Sea and the sovereignty of the Tiaoyutai Islands (known in Japan as the Senkaku Islands). Their conflicts of interest have gradually been coming to the surface.
The US-Japan security alliance has taken North Korea's threat to Japan as a focus. The Japanese government has always been reluctant to publicly acknowledge China as a threat, or to take it as an potential enemy due to its growing strength. However, behind Japan's enthusiastic discussion of the North Korean threat, it cannot ignore another security concern: a possible crisis in the Taiwan Strait brought by Taiwan and China.
For China, US-Japan cooperation on security is probably not less significant than North Korea's nuclear threat. Washington is Beijing's biggest rival. However, China in reality must still yield to the US hegemony, since its power is still developing. But Japan is another story.
On Feb. 19, the US-Japan Security Consultative Committee, a deputy-ministerial-level forum, further listed the Taiwan Strait as a "common strategic objective" in this region. The statement was made on the basis of the previous Defense Policy Review Initiative.
This adds a new variable to Japan's reluctance to acknowledge China as a threat, and the tense Sino-Japanese relationship that exists today.
As US President George W. Bush starts his second term, his administration has defined Japan as "an equal partner in a mature relationship." Apart from security and diplomacy, the scope of the alliance also includes global and cross-border issues, as well as economic and financial cooperation. This is very different from the US-defined "sincere, constructive and cooperative" Sino-US relationship.
In a US-dominated deputy-ministerial-level security meeting in late November last year, both the US and Japan said they believed that China plans to strengthen its military forces to prevent interference from other countries if a cross-strait war breaks out. They therefore see it as important to discourage this from happening -- through the expansion of US capabilities in the West Pacific Ocean.
This strategy of dissuasion is different from that of deterrence, as dissuasion attempts to dissolve China's hostile rise mainly through military and diplomatic means.
With the Security Consultative Committee having acknowledged peace in the Strait as a common objective, Japan's existing definition of "peripheral affairs" based on situations rather than locations may subtly change, as the Strait is not only a neighboring area but also related to Japan's security.
As CIA Director Porter Goss said before the Senate Armed Services Committee, "Beijing's military modernization and build-up could tilt the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait ... Improved Chinese capabilities threaten US forces in the region."
As China's national strength grows, the US and Japan are unable to avoid this question: What strategic benefits can they obtain from Taiwan? Once it is in the hands of an unfriendly country, how will this affect their political, military and economic interests?
In response to the committee's interference regarding the situation in the Strait, China will inevitably take more action against Japan, in addition to its long-standing actions against the US. The US and Japan, meanwhile, have made every effort to stop the EU from lifting its arms embargo on China.
At a time when Beijing is actively moving to pass an "anti-secession" law, Washington and Tokyo's new and clearly stated strategic attitude is better than any concrete military action.
Lin Cheng-yi is director of the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US