Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) has been appointed premier. We hope he will use the political experience and tolerance that turned Kaohsiung into a "maritime capital" to achieve the new Cabinet's goal of compromise and peace, and that he will put Taiwan on the road toward becoming a maritime nation.
A maritime people are characterized by being flexible, enlightened, adventurous and ready to open up new vistas, and maritime management is closely connected to foreign affairs.
In his The Freedom of the Seas, published in 1609, Hugo Grotius (Huig de Groot) defended the right of his country Holland to navigate the oceans, and established the concept that the seas were open to all, and made every nation treat the ocean as something important and something shared with all other nations.
The US has recognized the importance of this. In the 1940s and the 1970s, and today, the US either announced important maritime policies or passed major legislation establishing relevant committees, all stressing the nation's maritime rights in order to be able to maintain its global status.
We hope that the new Cabinet will continue to work to make Taiwan a maritime nation, while at the same time developing a maritime vision, new thinking and new vistas.
Sea travel and trade have always led to the development of innumerable ports and flourishing civilizations. Ocean settlements have been characterized by a melting together of different societies and cultures.
Over the past 400 years, Taiwan has been influenced by many disruptive forces, which have led to the creation of a multilayered and diversified culture. The question of how to extend these tangible and intangible cultural resources is closely connected to the perpetuation of Taiwan's appeal.
If we want the maritime concept to become deeply planted in the minds of people, people's lifestyles and the ocean must be integrated with each other. In future, the government should set up a corresponding system that continues to explore, re-interpret and nurture a new ethic and culture of "love for the ocean."
The role of ocean produce in a nation's economy cannot be ignored. Using Australia as an example, it has reported 8 percent growth in ocean produce annually, and by 2020, the annual production value of Australia's ocean produce will reach almost A$100 billion.
Kaohsiung harbor, originally built for the ship-breaking and yacht construction industry, has been developed into a harbor for the loading and unloading of containers and oceangoing fishing boats. The question of how Taiwan will be able to continue to display its strength in the fishing, foreign trade, shipping, tourism and biotechnology industries in the future is indeed a difficult issue for a maritime nation. The new government must consider and work hard to find out what Taiwan's maritime niche is.
However, any development of national land and industry must be able to sustain the environment.
Taiwan needs to gradually eliminate pollution and waste emissions, and move toward the goal of creating a sustainable, high-quality environment. Taiwan can start by working with industrial structural adjustments and purification technologies, and choose industries that have low pollution, low water and energy consumption, with high value.
Coastal developments must take environmental concerns into consideration. Concerns for reasonable land-use planning, and ideas such as green national income, or a public suffering index, as well as effective use of incentives, regulations and substitution programs should be encouraged, and thinking should not be stuck inflexibly on industrial technology or a single industry.
The successful experience with the Choutzu Wetland in Kaohsiung will hopefully be expanded to apply to all of Taiwan.
But measures for ocean protection management are still dependent on the government implementing an efficient and integrated system.
In the past, power over Taiwan's maritime matters was divided -- in particular, land and water, and harbor and urban areas were administered separately.
The city of Dunkerque in France provides a good example of integration -- a free port, harbor and city development has been integrated through an industrial environment mechanism in the Flanders-Dunkerque region.
This mechanism makes environmental quality its main concern; pollution prevention, where land use and landscape modifications must be jointly planned, and has been praised highly by the EU.
Hopefully, the new Cabinet will be able to use the harbor-city integration model developed in Kaohsiung in recent years to gradually integrate ocean-related issues such as ocean, coast, fishing, technological R&D and issues over the execution of laws.
All great maritime nations set up institutions in charge of maritime matters. A central organizational basic law should be created and the nation should set up ministries based on real needs.
Kaoshiung has set up the nation's first Maritime Bureau, but there is still no corresponding national authority. If Taiwan wants to effectively manage ocean and coastal matters, new consideration should be given to a maritime authority dealing with maritime rights and connected from the central government down to local governments in order to make Taiwan exist in unison with the ocean and to build a sustainable homeland.
Chiau Wen-yan is president of Foundation of Ocean Taiwan.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with