China has announced that its proposed anti-secession law will be enacted in March at the meeting of the National People's Congress. The details of the anti-secession law have yet to be released and are currently still considered secret, but Beijing has leaked some information through various channels that the law targets Taiwan and its independence activists. It will be used against anyone who propagates the idea of Taiwan's independence -- even outside China. Once this law is passed, any Taiwanese national at home or overseas could become a potential target of this law.
There has been a conspicuous lack of action taken by Taiwanese authorities to safeguard the security and freedom of Taiwanese people. Thus far, the Mainland Affairs Council has been the only government agency to come forward and call on Beijing not to enact the anti-secession law. It is worrying to think about how our government remains clueless about what to do in the face of this threat.
The enactment of the anti-secession law will certainly have repercussions for the Asia Pacific region. Although this law primarily targets Taiwan, China is also involved in other territorial conflicts.
Beijing, for example routinely bickers with Japan over the disputed Tiaoyutai (Senkaku) islands, a thought to be rich in oil reserves. India, too, does not see eye to eye with China on the border between these two countries. Vietnam and the Philippines have clashed with China over the Spratly Islands.
No one can guarantee that one day China will not extend the application of its anti-secession and use it as a pretext to attack Japan, India, Vietnam or the Philippines. If this happens, the prosperity and stability of the Asian Pacific region, and the leading role the US has been playing in this region will face a tough challenge.
China's unilateral proposal to enact the anti-secession law has encroached on the rights and interests of all Taiwanese people, unilaterally changed the status quo across the Taiwan Strait, and constitutes a new strategy by Beijing of using a legal apparatus to coerce Taiwan.
Therefore, the government should take active measures to ensure that the nation's sovereignty is not encroached upon, and to explain to the world what harm this anti-secession will do. The legislature should also enact an "anti-annexation" law or hold a referendum to counterbalance China's tyrannous act and reject the bellicose and chauvinist regime Beijing.
Wu Shuh-min is chairman of the Taiwan Society, North.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS