The Lunar New Year cross-strait charter flights got off the ground on Jan. 29. The headline in the Taiwan Daily said "Regular cross-strait flights around the corner," while the China Times used nine pages to cover every aspect of the event. Airports on both sides of the Taiwan Strait arranged a series of events, and the red Chinese flag was raised at Taoyuan International Airport, as if Taiwan was going through yet another "retrocession."
"This is a historic moment," said an excited Billy Chang (張國政), director-general of the Civil Aeronautics Administration.
The younger generations didn't experience a similar historic moment 60 years ago, when 6 million people were welcoming new arrivals. Then it was the 62nd Army, and now it is Taiwanese doing business in China. The 62nd Army brought the 228 Incident and 38 years of martial law. I wonder what the businesspeople will bring?
It is true that history keeps repeating itself, maybe because of an innate human inability to learn from it. In 1987, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government followed up on a Democratic Progressive Party initiative and lifted the ban on people from Taiwan visiting relatives in China. The government stressed that the lifting of the ban was restricted only to visiting relatives, and that using that as a pretext for any other activity would be met with severe punishment.
But many things that were not allowed in Taiwan were permitted abroad, and so opening a small door was in fact tantamount to opening the floodgates: Visiting relatives soon developed into tourism, and tourism developed into investment -- China fever is a fact.
Similarly, although the Mainland Affairs Council said that the charter flights would only be open to Taiwanese businesspeople, even Filipino housemaids were able to board. Council officials can't be so stupid that they did not anticipate this result. The reasoning of travellers was, "If it is OK for Taiwanese businesspeople, then why wouldn't it also be OK for overseas students; if it is OK for overseas students, then why wouldn't it be OK for Filipino housemaids?"
Following this line of reasoning, if Lunar New Year's charter flights are OK, then why wouldn't flights on other holidays be OK? If flights on holidays are OK, then why not flights on normal days? Like Chang said: "Regular cross-strait flights are just around the corner."
There were reports that when the China Southern flight landed in Taoyuan at 9:27am on Jan. 29, applause and shouts of welcome broke out in the waiting room, where everyone present celebrated these ice-breaking flights.
But we should not let anyone forget that when the 2,160m-long bridge on Penghu Island was opened 37 years ago (connecting Hsiyu with the two other main islands of Penghu, cutting travel time from Hsiyu to Makung to half an hour), both the government and public celebrated, saying that the project would open the door for the development of Hsiyu.
Today the island is as desolate as ever, and the population has been reduced by half.
In August 1979, the opening of Makung airport was met with anticipation by residents and businesspeople alike. The champagne flowed and it was said to be a historic moment for Penghu. From that moment on, Penghu residents could fly directly to Taipei and Tainan, and everyone thought that Penghu's becoming the Pearl of the Taiwan Strait was just around the corner.
Penghu, however, has met with the same fate as Hsiyu. No matter how hard Penghu County commissioners have worked to attract businesses, Penghu's money and talent have kept flowing toward Taiwan.
Twenty-six years have gone by, and although the population of Taiwan has almost doubled, Penghu's population has dwindled, falling from 110,000 to a bit over 90,000. International examples of bigger economic entities absorbing smaller economic entities are too numerous to mention.
I sincerely hope that this part of history will not be repeated in Taiwan. But if we listen to our economic officials and the theories of unificationist scholars, then "market forces are unstoppable." Taiwan will follow in the wake of Penghu, and a repeat of history will be unavoidable.
No matter what, it is too late to change. Only history will tell what significance the historic moment on Jan. 29 held for the future development of Taiwan. We will know in 10 or 20 years' time.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS