I think it's well known that the Chinese government is subliminally fanning the flames of nationalism, not only with the Taiwan issue, but also encouraging hatred of the Japanese and foreigners in general.
Without the "mission" of uniting the motherland, there would be no reason to continue the myth of Mao Zedong's (
In addition, if the Chicoms do not manipulate the focus of the sheeple [sic], the masses may finally get a backbone again (like in 1989) and complain about bigger, more important issues and cause real social instability and leadership change.
Ironic issue one: Taiwan is one of the key factors making it possible for China to do so well in attracting capital and technology. [The Taiwanese] not only invest in factories, equipment, technology transfers, supply chains, etc, but also spend a lot of time and money on educating the engineers and workers. What do they get in return? They get 706 missiles pointed at them.
Ironic issue two: It is amazing to see the Chinese being so gullible and blind to the true value of what Taiwan represents to them.
Instead of seeing Taiwan as a bright light in their future and something to strive toward (less corruption, more transparency in banking/investment/judiciary, relatively cleaner environment, leadership elected by the people, etc), all they see is the "more important" issue of reunification.
It seems that if they were smart, they would use Taiwan as an example to challenge their leaders that democracy will work in a Chinese society. They should demand nothing less from their government.
Ironic issue three: I think there would not even be a separation issue if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership would only give the Taiwanese some dignity and respect.
It seems that many Taiwanese feel deep down that they are part of a larger Chinese society.
Perhaps if China makes a gesture of friendship, such as removing the missiles and declaring that it would never use force, Taiwan can do something in return, such as giving back the national treasures (with the stipulation that one-third has to always be on display in Taiwan and will also be protected when the CCP finally loses power).
If only it were so easy. Obviously China has even bigger problems and issues to deal with. Securing energy resources stands out, which necessitates a strong military and a continual brainwashing of the people.
Marc Plumb
Taipei
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS