I think it's well known that the Chinese government is subliminally fanning the flames of nationalism, not only with the Taiwan issue, but also encouraging hatred of the Japanese and foreigners in general.
Without the "mission" of uniting the motherland, there would be no reason to continue the myth of Mao Zedong's (
In addition, if the Chicoms do not manipulate the focus of the sheeple [sic], the masses may finally get a backbone again (like in 1989) and complain about bigger, more important issues and cause real social instability and leadership change.
Ironic issue one: Taiwan is one of the key factors making it possible for China to do so well in attracting capital and technology. [The Taiwanese] not only invest in factories, equipment, technology transfers, supply chains, etc, but also spend a lot of time and money on educating the engineers and workers. What do they get in return? They get 706 missiles pointed at them.
Ironic issue two: It is amazing to see the Chinese being so gullible and blind to the true value of what Taiwan represents to them.
Instead of seeing Taiwan as a bright light in their future and something to strive toward (less corruption, more transparency in banking/investment/judiciary, relatively cleaner environment, leadership elected by the people, etc), all they see is the "more important" issue of reunification.
It seems that if they were smart, they would use Taiwan as an example to challenge their leaders that democracy will work in a Chinese society. They should demand nothing less from their government.
Ironic issue three: I think there would not even be a separation issue if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership would only give the Taiwanese some dignity and respect.
It seems that many Taiwanese feel deep down that they are part of a larger Chinese society.
Perhaps if China makes a gesture of friendship, such as removing the missiles and declaring that it would never use force, Taiwan can do something in return, such as giving back the national treasures (with the stipulation that one-third has to always be on display in Taiwan and will also be protected when the CCP finally loses power).
If only it were so easy. Obviously China has even bigger problems and issues to deal with. Securing energy resources stands out, which necessitates a strong military and a continual brainwashing of the people.
Marc Plumb
Taipei
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS