Ever since China's ascent to the global economic stage, the principles of "production factor price equalization" and "externality" (an unintentional, nonmarket, interdependence between economic decision makers) means it has an impact on neighboring countries.
On the positive side, China has provided cheap labor and consumer products, in addition to being a destination for surplus foreign capital and even pollution from other countries. The negative aspects have been rising unemployment, the widening of the wealth gap, an increasing social welfare expenditure, increased spending on the prevention of disease, illegal immigration and security issues.
For political reasons, China has sought to exclude Taiwan from these arrangements. Taiwan is concerned that it is being marginalized in this process.
Over the past few years, many Taiwanese have begun to worry about how they are going to make a living. There are five things the nation could do to secure its future development and survival.
First, based on the idea of comparative advantage, Taiwan should develop industries which China lacks. This is relevant to developing the hi-tech industries, which include improving education, building technology parks, developing the service industry and attracting skilled workers. By developing industries according to the principle of comparative advantage, Taiwan can distinguish itself from China.
The second part is to speed up development in non-trade-related sectors to make Taiwan a better place to invest in, and strengthening its overall competitiveness. Past efforts to do this have, for the most, part centered around measures such as reduction of, or exemption from, taxes. From now on, these efforts must be taken further, and the country's desirability must be increased so foreign investment, can be used to raise the standard of living.
It is also imperative that the financial, medical and education systems are developed to conform to international standards, and the passing of legislation related to the economy needs to be sped up. Another major prerequisite for internationalization is the creation of an English speaking environment.
The third part is to improve Taiwan's links to international economic networks, in spite of China's efforts to exclude it from regional economic integration. As long as the policies outlined in suggestions one and two are implemented, Taiwan should be able to retain its competitiveness, and there should be no need to worry about being marginalized.
In the past, Taiwan has tried to implement free trade agreements, but as a result of pressure from China, many have failed to come to fruition. In the future we should try to develop international economic networks that are, for all intents and purposes, free trade agreements, without actually being named as such.
The next part concerns industries whose technology and end products are similar to those in China. These fall within the scope of the "production factor price equalization principle," and as such, these industries should be relocated outside of Taiwan. The government should offer incentives for companies to move to locations around the globe.
The fifth part is concerned with externalities produced as a result of contact with China. This is closely connected to democratization and related legislation. Here we refer to China dealing with the spread of disease, illegal migration, and pass legislation to prepare for the "small three links."
There is a great need for more research to be done into developing a strategy regarding relations with China.
Chang Jung-feng is vice-president of the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research. The views expressed here do not represent those of the institution.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers