Saturday saw the much-awaited return of People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
While in the US he paid a trip to Washington in the vain hope that officials there could restore his morale by treating him as a serious contender for Taiwan's presidency. Quite the reverse, they appear to have treated him rather as a serious pain in the neck, because of his party's opposition to purchasing the weapons the US has offered Taiwan.
We can only hope that on closer acquaintance the US better understands exactly whose interests Soong has at heart. The nature of those interests are quite plain: Soong wishes to go down as a great Chinese historical figure by accomplishing "reunification" -- handing Taiwan over to the People's Republic of China. And naturally he is opposed to anything that would interfere with this vision of his manifest destiny, such as Taiwan's democratic processes or US weapons.
There has been much ado about the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) trying to work together with Soong and the PFP to try to break the current political impasse. This idea seems to be dead, thank goodness.
The sensible option for the DPP was always to wait until KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Soong and the PFP, on the other hand, are not constructive in any way, representing as they do the rump of the Mainlander ascendency who, as John Tkacik so memorably said, prefer China rule Taiwan rather than Taiwanese rule Taiwan. The DPP's courting of Soong was either a publicity exercise of the deepest cynicism or, if seriously meant, a piece of folly for which the country might have paid dearly.
As for Soong, the degree of speculation over his intentions prior to his return, not to mention his feting at the airport only go to show the limits of Taiwan's much vaunted democratic transition.
The idea of spreading democracy promulgated by Western powers since the end of the Cold War has always centered on elections. Certainly free and fair elections are necessary to what we understand as liberal democracy, but they are far from sufficient. Other factors matter as well, especially the rule of law. If this can be flouted with impunity, then elections become little more than an argument over who should share the spoils.
Taiwan has great steps to take before we can say the rule of law effectively applies. Soong's very prominence gives the lie to any notion of the rule of law applying in this society. There is a wealth of evidence to show that Soong is a thief. He is known to have put NT$360 million of KMT funds illegally -- ie, without the consent of the party -- into his family members' bank accounts. That is theft. Since he had management of the funds at the time as the KMT's secretary general it is also breach of trust.
And this leads us to a bitter paradox: Taiwan will not enjoy the rule of law and will not be the liberal democracy it claims to be while the government is trying to woo someone like Soong. Taiwan will only be a real democracy when Soong is in jail.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS