Since the Government Information Office on Jan. 1 rearranged all the cable TV channels into several categories in accordance with program characteristics, tune-in ratings for news networks declined by 24 percent. Consequently, broadcast news media have been racking their brains trying to figure out a way to win back viewers.
As a result of fierce competition, that networks sensationalize the content of their news reports is nothing new. Over the past two years, news networks have developed three methods to attract higher ratings. First, news channels have indulged in covering stories about betel nut girls, exotic dancers and scantily clad ladies, and give extended coverage of young ladies wearing skimpy costumes or swimwear.
According to the management of one news channel, the strategy of selling sex is effective in boosting the ratings, and is now being used by various news networks. No wonder the news coverage of computer exhibitions held in Taiwan have focused on the sexy models posing coquettishly next to new products rather than the products themselves.
Second, now that the sexy bandwagon has swept across the nation, viewers will sooner or later find it tedious. The quick-witted news channels, therefore, have switched the direction of their reporting and appealed to viewers by producing so-called "exclusive" news reports. The idea may tempt the viewer flipping through the channels to pause and view the "exclusive" coverage -- filled with distorted or exaggerated content -- and with the word "exclusive" appearing prominently on the screen. These are little more than gimmicks used to lure viewers.
No matter how "exclusive" the news report is, many viewers are attracted simply because of the word "exclusive," so the strategy is successful in nudging up ratings.
Naive viewers seemingly still cannot see through the "exclusive" gimmick, and thus, the ruse is still being used by the majority of news networks.
Third, the news channels have recently started employing fear as a strategy to attract viewers. For instance, during the nation's typhoon season, news channels would repeatedly stress that an approaching typhoon was the strongest ever to hit the nation, and the anchorperson would remind viewers to stay tuned for the latest updates.
Furthermore, news channels would either interview astrologers or fortune tellers and ask them to give apocalyptic and catastrophic predictions that would frighten people.
Although these scare tactics are still in what appears to be a trial period, news networks have found it even more useful than the "exclusive" gimmick, especially after torrential rains hit the nation and the tsunami devastated much of Southeast Asia on Dec. 26. It is likely to be widely adopted by most of the news networks.
Commercial new networks pursuing ratings is unavoidable, and it is not practical to demand that they stop this practice. To win favor with viewers, news channels should enrich the content and enhance the quality of their reporting rather than continue to adopt more outrageous ways to deceive viewers in an attempt to boost ratings.
The public will eventually see through their tricks, so this strategy will not work in the long term. Time will tell if the proprietors of media outlets will realize the importance of this issue and stop duping their viewers.
Chen Ping-hung is an associate professor of the Graduate Institute of Mass Communications at National Taiwan Normal University.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers