The Fifth Legislative Yuan came to an end yesterday after an all-night marathon. The political fallout of the presidential and legislative elections meant this legislature was rife with inter-party opposition, boycotts and deadlock, and it is difficult to be satisfied with the quality of debate or the efficiency of the legislative process.
Although the legislature met for 28 hours on its final day, many bills were still left unattended to. Only 56 bills were passed during the whole session. Neither the organic law of the Executive Yuan (
Since a legislative session cannot be extended, the next legislature must start anew, and society as a whole must pay the price for the postponement of reforms. Such lack of efficiency is unacceptable in a modern society.
One bill that was passed earlier in the session was the controversial March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute" (
Then there was the legislature's refusal to review and confirm nominees to the Control Yuan, a move that violates the Constitution and the duties of legislators. It means that the Control Yuan will not be formed within the legally stipulated time, and this still has to be dealt with.
In terms of budget scrutiny, opposition legislators obstructed and voted down requests to include the NT$610.8 billion special arms budget in the legislative agenda. This will not only demoralize the military but is detrimental to national security. The international community will be right to be skeptical of our determination to defend ourselves if law-makers are reluctant to purchase advanced weapons. This could further strain relations with Washington.
As the political stalemate between the governing and opposition parties remains, the opposition abused their legislative majority by slashing the government's annual revenue request by NT$110 billion, almost causing a budget deficit of NT$70 billion. Thanks to the timely intervention of Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jing-pyng (
The deliberate obstruction by the opposition parties of the budget will cause the deficit to grow and will affect the privatization of state-run enterprises. Even more vicious is the retaliatory manner in which the government and opposition approached the budget.
Because the pan-blue legislators were unhappy with the grand justices ruling on the 319 committee, they revoked the professional payment for judges listed in the budget. The Government Information Office's miscellaneous funds were also rejected because broadcasting channels are to be restructured. There was even a rumor that four lawmakers facing charges of electoral fraud had offered to support various budget allocations if the charges were dropped.
The government, the lawmakers and society are all losers with the closing of the Fifth Legislative Yuan. Hopefully President Chen Shui-bian (
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS