Judging from the way things look, there will be no Control Yuan members reporting for duty for a while. The pan-blue legislative caucuses yesterday still refused to even review the nominations made by President Chen Shui-bian (
What is so ridiculous about this whole thing is not that the pan-blues are unhappy with the list of nominees presented for its approval; after all, it is virtually impossible to come up with a list that is acceptable to all. The puzzling thing is this: The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party do not even want to look at the list. They have thus far abused their legislative majority by refusing to even place the review of the nominations on the agenda.
If they think that any particular nominees are ill-qualified or if they simply don't like someone, they can just vote "no" to these individuals' nominations. As a matter of fact, if they are so unhappy with the entire list, they can reject each and every nominee.
What this really amounts to is a refusal on the part of the pan-blue legislators to perform their duty to review and approve or disapprove the president's nominations. According to Article 7 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution, members of the Control Yuan are to be chosen by nomination by the president and with the consent of the Legislative Yuan. In other words, the Constitution stipulates that the Legislative Yuan must participate in the decision-making process for the appointment of Control Yuan members. While there is no requirement that the legislature must give its consent, it cannot refuse flat-out to even review the nominations.
Leaving aside the issue of the constitutionality of the pan-blue lawmakers' conduct, they have also betrayed the voters' confidence and trust by refusing to perform their duty.
Moreover, between the scenario in which the pan-blues simply reject the candidates they feel are ill-qualified and then have the president make alternative nominations for just those vacancies, on the one hand, and the scenario in which the president resubmits a totally new list that is acceptable to the pan-blue camp, the end result will be pretty much the same, except that the second scenario will make the president look bad -- like a schoolboy being instructed to redo his homework.
Actually, since his election Chen has made many progressive reforms to the manner in which Control Yuan nominees are produced. In the past, the president made the decision himself, behind closed doors. Chen has implemented a system in which others can also make recommendations, after which special committees are established by the president to review these recommendations. The entire nomination process is highly transparent. Under the circumstances, it is indeed difficult to imagine that Chen's list could be unacceptable in its entirety.
The public has the most to lose due to such unreasonable bickering between politicians. As a result of the pan-blue lawmakers' refusal to perform their duty, several important national examinations -- including the licensing examinations for doctors, nurses and technicians, may be postponed, since legally speaking these tests must be monitored by members of the Control Yuan. It is truly regretful that the pan-blues have failed to place the public interest above all else.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS