There is no doubt that Australian Prime Minister John Howard was very quick to grasp the enormity of the tsunami disaster and the opportunities it presented for boosting Australia's stature in Asia.
At a time when the world was being told more than 20,000 people were dead, a team of advisors told Howard that the death toll would exceed 100,000. In the space of a week before the recent Tsunami Aid Summit in Jakarta, Howard and his team worked intensively with the Indonesian administration on a "partnership for reconstruction and redevelopment," which caught other nations and the UN by surprise.
Within days, unarmed Australian soldiers were landing in Indonesia's previously "forbidden" province of Aceh to take guidance from the local authorities grappling with the extent of the destruction that has obliterated life along a sprawling coastal strip.
Aceh has been in a state of civil war in recent years. Resentment at the alleged excesses of the central government has turned it into a hot bed for Islamic extremist groups driven by the twin goals of establishing the rule of religious law and striking against perceived western interests or decadent influences.
Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono -- known as SBY -- took every opportunity publicly to express his deep gratitude to Howard for making Australia "first on the ground" in a death zone where more than 130,000 people are now known to have perished.
This was a marked departure on Jakarta's stance toward Australia immediately before the disaster, when Yudhoyono had instructed his officials to brief foreign correspondents on his displeasure at Howard's continued commitment to a policy of striking first at anti-Australian terrorists in "neighboring countries" and declaring maritime security zones that included about 40 percent of Indonesian waters.
Now all this bad feeling seems to have been buried under mountains of Australian cash and aid.
In one startling no-nonsense gesture for which no advance warning was sent to Washington, London, Beijing or Tokyo, Howard pledged far more than a down payment of A$1 billion in cash to assist in the recovery and rebuilding of Indonesia alone when he attended last week's aid summit. That response eclipsed those of Germany (US$650 million), Japan (US$500 million) and the US (US$350 million), and making China's donation of US$63 million seem trivial.
The Australian prime minister waved off questions about monetary value, saying: "This is all about pragmatism. Something had to be done immediately. We are a rich nation, we can afford to be generous, and we will stay the distance with our neighbors in their time of dire need."
While it took UN Secretary General Kofi Annan 14 days to reach the stricken zones the government in Canberra had people on the ground within hours. By the time Annan was in Jakarta, Australia had bypassed the aid apparatus of the UN with a bilateral assistance commission working 24 hours a day out of a Spartan office in the nation's Bappenas planning agency.
"We don't think it necessary to engage the efforts of the UN when we are dealing with a terrible disaster on our doorstep," Howard said.
In his blunt style, Howard said there were dangers of wastefulness and delays in "unnecessarily bureaucratizing the relief effort" and said he would not allow a situation where Australian taxpayers' dollars were put into the hands of others.
The Howard government is well known for characterizing the UN as a bloated bureaucracy with a blemished record in dealing with atrocities committed by developing nations against their own ethnic minorities.
But keeping the UN out of frame was not top of the government's aid response agenda. Briefing the parliamentary press gallery, an official said: "Out of this appalling tragedy there may be a real opportunity to take the relationship with Jakarta to a higher level if we get this right."
These benefits included Australian business participation in reconstruction and the rise toward prosperity of Indonesia, the world's most populous predominantly Muslim nation, and Australia's nearest neighbor. Howard and Foreign Minister Alexander Downer also spoke of the benefits the aid program could have in strengthening the resolve of Asian nations against terrorist groups based on their soil days before outgoing US Secretary of State Colin Powell began to say the same thing.
Until the tsunami struck, relations between Canberra and Jakarta were strained and had been so for many years. On Oct. 16, 1975 in the first phase of Jakarta's invasion of the former Portuguese colony of East Timor, four Australian and one New Zealand newsmen -- the so-called "Balibo five" -- were butchered by Indonesian Special Forces.
Relations soured further when in 1999 Australian forces led a UN mission to secure its transition to independence from Jakarta.
Today though, those events are considered off-limits by spokespeople for both governments.
As officials have said in Canberra this week, Jakarta has its own reasons for embracing the Australian aid initiatives, hoping tensions over East Timor can be "diluted" by the common cause presented by an overwhelming natural disaster.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers