There is no doubt that Australian Prime Minister John Howard was very quick to grasp the enormity of the tsunami disaster and the opportunities it presented for boosting Australia's stature in Asia.
At a time when the world was being told more than 20,000 people were dead, a team of advisors told Howard that the death toll would exceed 100,000. In the space of a week before the recent Tsunami Aid Summit in Jakarta, Howard and his team worked intensively with the Indonesian administration on a "partnership for reconstruction and redevelopment," which caught other nations and the UN by surprise.
Within days, unarmed Australian soldiers were landing in Indonesia's previously "forbidden" province of Aceh to take guidance from the local authorities grappling with the extent of the destruction that has obliterated life along a sprawling coastal strip.
Aceh has been in a state of civil war in recent years. Resentment at the alleged excesses of the central government has turned it into a hot bed for Islamic extremist groups driven by the twin goals of establishing the rule of religious law and striking against perceived western interests or decadent influences.
Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono -- known as SBY -- took every opportunity publicly to express his deep gratitude to Howard for making Australia "first on the ground" in a death zone where more than 130,000 people are now known to have perished.
This was a marked departure on Jakarta's stance toward Australia immediately before the disaster, when Yudhoyono had instructed his officials to brief foreign correspondents on his displeasure at Howard's continued commitment to a policy of striking first at anti-Australian terrorists in "neighboring countries" and declaring maritime security zones that included about 40 percent of Indonesian waters.
Now all this bad feeling seems to have been buried under mountains of Australian cash and aid.
In one startling no-nonsense gesture for which no advance warning was sent to Washington, London, Beijing or Tokyo, Howard pledged far more than a down payment of A$1 billion in cash to assist in the recovery and rebuilding of Indonesia alone when he attended last week's aid summit. That response eclipsed those of Germany (US$650 million), Japan (US$500 million) and the US (US$350 million), and making China's donation of US$63 million seem trivial.
The Australian prime minister waved off questions about monetary value, saying: "This is all about pragmatism. Something had to be done immediately. We are a rich nation, we can afford to be generous, and we will stay the distance with our neighbors in their time of dire need."
While it took UN Secretary General Kofi Annan 14 days to reach the stricken zones the government in Canberra had people on the ground within hours. By the time Annan was in Jakarta, Australia had bypassed the aid apparatus of the UN with a bilateral assistance commission working 24 hours a day out of a Spartan office in the nation's Bappenas planning agency.
"We don't think it necessary to engage the efforts of the UN when we are dealing with a terrible disaster on our doorstep," Howard said.
In his blunt style, Howard said there were dangers of wastefulness and delays in "unnecessarily bureaucratizing the relief effort" and said he would not allow a situation where Australian taxpayers' dollars were put into the hands of others.
The Howard government is well known for characterizing the UN as a bloated bureaucracy with a blemished record in dealing with atrocities committed by developing nations against their own ethnic minorities.
But keeping the UN out of frame was not top of the government's aid response agenda. Briefing the parliamentary press gallery, an official said: "Out of this appalling tragedy there may be a real opportunity to take the relationship with Jakarta to a higher level if we get this right."
These benefits included Australian business participation in reconstruction and the rise toward prosperity of Indonesia, the world's most populous predominantly Muslim nation, and Australia's nearest neighbor. Howard and Foreign Minister Alexander Downer also spoke of the benefits the aid program could have in strengthening the resolve of Asian nations against terrorist groups based on their soil days before outgoing US Secretary of State Colin Powell began to say the same thing.
Until the tsunami struck, relations between Canberra and Jakarta were strained and had been so for many years. On Oct. 16, 1975 in the first phase of Jakarta's invasion of the former Portuguese colony of East Timor, four Australian and one New Zealand newsmen -- the so-called "Balibo five" -- were butchered by Indonesian Special Forces.
Relations soured further when in 1999 Australian forces led a UN mission to secure its transition to independence from Jakarta.
Today though, those events are considered off-limits by spokespeople for both governments.
As officials have said in Canberra this week, Jakarta has its own reasons for embracing the Australian aid initiatives, hoping tensions over East Timor can be "diluted" by the common cause presented by an overwhelming natural disaster.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US