Show us the programming
It was a year ago that International Community Radio Taipei's (ICRT) morning team of Rick Monday and Bill Thissen began a petition to bring its audience better cable TV. The individual chambers of commerce, the Community Services Center and other organizations joined the effort by putting a petition on their Web sites.
Over 30,000 listeners responded and the petition was handed to the Government Information Office director. Today I have more and better choices of cable TV programming. That cooperation between ICRT and the English-speaking community is missing under general manager Janet Chu (朱雅如).
Anthony van Dyck and Gus Adapon's suggestion ("Keep the ICRT true to its mandate," Jan. 10, page 8) that the business community contribute NT$1,000 per year for quality English-language radio programming got me thinking. If those 30,000 listeners who signed Rick and Bill's petition each contributed NT$1,000 a year to bringing back a quality morning show, ICRT would receive revenue of NT$30 million from a three-hour show. Chu could then do whatever she wanted during the other hours and ICRT would still survive.
ICRT chairman Nelson Chang (張安平) seems to be saying "show me the money and I'll bring back professional announcers." The message, it seems to me, should be "show us quality programming" and then ask for sponsorship.
CK Rusty Lee
Neihu
ICRT part of our existence
Thank you for bringing out in public the ICRT's issues concerning the international community in Taiwan. ICRT's primary mandate is to serve the international community and to bridge the gap between cultures, which makes the station vital and useful to both international and local audiences.
With all these improper changes at ICRT, such as going from English programming to "Chinglish" and cutting down on all important shows and free community service ads, it has alienated its own benefactors -- the foreign community. Therefore, the international community is appealing for help and support to bring back the real ICRT with its high standard of English programming and community-based services.
Our concerns and opinions about the station's effectiveness have not even been polled, so why the abrupt changes from a non-profit station to ambitious business competition? I hope that Nelson Chang (張安平) [chairman of the Taipei International Community Cultural Foundation] could resolve this as soon as possible by bringing back the original programming.
It is to be hoped that support from the foreign community will come to light as losing the station means losing a vital part of our very existence in Taiwan.
Irene de Pablo
Taipei
Who cares?
After reading, painfully, "Keep ICRT true to its mandate" (Jan. 10, page 8), I can't help but wonder: Who cares about a lousy radio station like ICRT? I don't.
Jerome Favre
Taipei
Bring back the old ICRT
Does it seem odd to anyone else that ICRT chairman Nelson Chang is on the one hand asking corporations to support ICRT while at the same time refusing to bring back the programming schedule ICRT's listeners are asking for?
Chang can do anything he wants with his station, but if he presents programming that only he wants, then he needs to ask KGI Securities, Taiwan Cement and the China Trust bank to sponsor ICRT.
How many businesses will be willing to fund a radio station based solely on a promise to reverse its strategy? Chang, bring back the programming, then ask for support.
Jamie Yang
Banciao
Who killed ICRT?
It used to be a big pleasure to listen to this radio channel. It used to be a station with a foreign flavor. It used to be great when students were able to understand ICRT. The attractive male and female voices attracted thousands and thousands of listeners. It used to be full of mystery.
Right now, an unknown tornado has turned it upside down. Listeners don't know why they are tuning in to FM100 anymore. They don't know if the DJs' English usage is correct. Listeners don't want to be part of the ICRT gang anymore. Sad. Listeners are mostly turning off our favorite radio station because there aren't any familiar DJs, except for Ron Stewart.
Many times listeners cannot even find the channel, because the music and voices are almost indistinguishable from other local radio stations. Who killed ICRT? Who will give the listeners the answer? I do care.
Liya Su
Banciao
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past