Amid dancing and singing, Sudan's former adversaries sat down together on Sunday to sign piles of thick documents outlining how peace will be brought to southern Sudan.
Southern Sudanese, some in T-shirts with the Sudanese flag, others clad in tribal attire, looked on as Sudanese Vice President Ali Osman Taha and southern rebel leader John Garang signed the accords.
ILLUSTRATION YUSHA
The signing officially brings an end to the longest-running war in Africa. Apart from a relatively peaceful period between 1972 and 1983, the southern Sudanese have seen nothing but war since the country's independence from Britain in 1956.
About 2 million people are estimated to have died as a result of the war, and 4 million people have been forced from their homes.
Garang, soon to be made vice-president in a power-sharing interim government, told reporters before the signing ceremony that it was a highly emotional moment for himself and for the Sudanese people.
He said that on New Year's Eve, when the last partial agreements, including a permanent ceasefire were signed, it was 42 years since he went into the bush to join the rebels he was eventually to lead.
During Sunday's signing ceremony, surrounded by presidents and other dignitaries, Garang, normally chatty and quick to make jokes, seemed taken by the gravity of the moment.
The leaders speaking during the ceremony underlined that the work to bring real peace to Sudan is not over. In fact, it is just beginning.
"It may be the end of war but it is only the beginning of peace," in the words of US Secretary of State Colin Powell.
"It is good to have an agreement on paper ... but there must be some tangible results to follow it," said Samson Kwaje, a rebel spokesman.
"The signing marks the beginning of a long and challenging road ahead. Both parties will continue to face many trials," said Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki, whose government has made a name for itself as a regional peace broker, supplying the top mediators for both the Sudanese and Somali peace talks.
The next step will be the drafting of an interim constitution, to be ready in the next weeks, and the subsequent formation of a power-sharing government.
In July, a six year interim period will start, during which southern Sudan will be autonomous. At the end of six years, a referendum on southern independence will be held.
But although there were scenes of overwhelming joy at Sunday's ceremony, it will be difficult to immediately end decades of mutual distrust.
"I am very happy. The war was going on for so long. But I am not confident that peace will be recognized by the Arabs [in government].
"We will have final peace only when we are separated," said John Mangok, a rebel military official from southern Sudan.
The peace agreement does not cover the more recent and more publicised conflict in the western Darfur region, where 70,000 people are believed to have died and 1.6 million forced from their homes since the conflict broke out nearly two years ago.
Powell, whose government said genocide has been taking place in Darfur, said on the eve of the signing that "great efforts" needed to be done in order to end the conflict in Darfur, and on Sunday he urged the "new partners in peace" to act immediately to end the violence and atrocities there.
It is has been generally hoped that a peace deal for the south will serve as a blueprint for the west, but some observers say that the goodwill earned by the government by signing the peace deal for the south may make it hard to pressure it on making peace in Darfur.
The north-south peace deal is expected to trigger the release of 400 million euros (US$520 million) of European aid to Sudan, but some analysts have suggested that the only way to force the government to end the war in Darfur would be to link the southern aid money to peace in the west.
Regardless of how the international community chooses to work toward peace in Darfur, the south, devastated and forgotten during decades of war, will have to be rebuilt. The south needs roads, schools and government institutions.
The southern authorities also need to repatriate and resettle 500,000 Sudanese refugees who are scattered in the neighbouring countries, as well as around three million displaced people who are still inside Sudan.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US