The holiday season now upon us is a time for festivity, and usually overeating. But the rampant consumption of sugar that marks this time of year is nothing to celebrate.
In fact, the seasonal upsurge in sugar consumption is just part of a huge transition in world health that is now underway. Many countries, especially developing countries, are facing the consequences of huge changes in lifestyle: modifications in diet, lower levels of physical activity, and increased tobacco use.
ILLUSTRATION YUSHA
These changes are determined to a large extent by the globalization and expansion of food markets and by ever-greater levels of urbanization. Both of these factors incite sedentary behavior at home and at work, as well as profound alterations in dietary habits.
So it should be no surprise that noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), obesity, diabetes and cancer now kill 33 million people around the world each year and cause almost 60 percent of total deaths. Indeed, they account for almost half the global burden of disease.
By 2020, that contribution is expected to rise to 73 percent of all deaths and 60 percent of the global burden of disease. Moreover, more than 60 percent of these deaths occur in the developing world, and it is here that NCDs increasingly appear in younger age groups, which can have huge implications for how productive a country's workers are.
Recent data from China reflect the extent of the problem. In China's rural areas, with more than 800 million people, NCDs account for more than 80 percent of deaths.
Many countries are now afflicted by a double burden of diseases. Countries that still struggle with malnutrition and illnesses like malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS must now contend with an explosion of CVDs, diabetes and obesity, as well as soaring rates of high blood pressure and high blood cholesterol.
Indeed, five of the 10 leading causes of death worldwide are related to diet and physical activity: high blood pressure, high cholesterol, low intake of fruit and vegetables, high body mass index and insufficient exercise. Clearly, effective strategies to tackle the NCD burden require a critical examination of what people are eating and their levels of physical activity.
The World Health Organization (WHO), together with a group of international experts, has developed a global strategy on diet, physical activity and health over a period of 18 months through an extensive series of consultations in more than 80 countries, and with the input of UN bodies, civic groups and food producers. One of the strategy's key conclusions is that reducing the burden of NCDs requires a multi-sectoral approach. Like a toolbox, the strategy provides WHO members with a comprehensive range of policy options from which to choose.
Governments can act. Transport ministries should provide safe roads so that children can bike to school.
Finance ministers could tax unhealthy food and subsidize healthy food.
And education ministers should demand healthy school meals.
Many countries are already developing their own national strategies. Most of what WHO is recommending has been endorsed by public-health officials for many years. But we face a global problem, with many international stakeholders, and this requires an urgent and worldwide response.
Of course, there is considerable debate about what precisely makes for a healthy diet. This debate is both welcome and to be expected; improving diet and finding ways to increase physical activity is a complex issue. Moreover, there will always be groups with their own interests, using arguments that we do not have sufficient evidence to act. But there has been no challenge to the strategy's recommendations from the global scientific or public-health community.
The strongest critique has come from sugar associations, who claim that the upper limit of 10 percent on caloric intake from sugar is not based upon scientific evidence. However, more than 20 national and international reports from around the world by scientific bodies governing dietary recommendations set similar or lower targets for sugar intake.
The growing NCD and CVD burden is a time bomb for world health. The implementation of the WHO's strategy could lead to one of the largest-ever positive shifts in human health, putting populations throughout the world on pathways to lifelong and sustained improvements in well-being.
Kaare Norum is a professor of medicine and nutrition at the University of Oslo.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers