How much ignorance and selfishness does it take to regard the suffering of others as an opportunity for one's personal gain?
We cannot do much but accept the fact that many innocent lives were claimed by the natural tsunamis on Dec. 26, while countless others lost their homes and are suffering from a shortage of supplies. In this light, it is very difficult for anyone with human feelings not to feel angry and upset about the selfishness and cold attitudes shown by some Taiwanese people and media outlets toward those suffering as a result of this disaster.
Control Yuan President Fredrick Chien (
According to the media, after confirming that "the golf court is located in the mountains, and that the hotel to stay next to the court has remained unaffected" and "his personal safety, transportation, food and accommodation is not a problem," Chien went to Phuket to "make his wish come true."
There is nothing wrong with playing golf. But why play it now, while victims and rescuers are in need of food and drinkable water? How can Chien think only about his pleasure when others in the same area are working so desperately to deal with the tragic aftermath of the tsunami? As a very high-level government official, how does he intend to lead Taiwanese society with the kind of "courage and insistence" he shows in this matter?
Prior to the disaster, hardly any Taiwanese media outlets bothered to station reporters in Southeast Asia. I have not seen any particularly valuable news stories filed by Taiwanese reporters who have recently entered Sri Lanka, India, Thailand or Indonesia in order to capture the "usual" tragic disaster scenes.
The "best" bits of information they have offered thus far -- compared to the international media -- was in ruthlessly forcing Taiwanese victims and their families to speak on camera.
Take the senseless reporter who asked a tearful old man who'd lost his son "How will your family carry on with their lives?" knowing full well that the deceased was the main income earner in the family.
Another reporter went to disturb a six-year-old girl who was just rescued from a coconut tree with the question: "How many days has it been since you've had breakfast?" Worse still was the reporter who insisted on asking a husband whose wife remains missing, "how do you feel now?"
Anyone with a heart would know how these people feel. Who needs cold-blooded reporters to raise such cruel questions?
The tourism sector in southern Taiwan came out and said bluntly that Kenting could "seize the opportunity" of attracting tourists who would otherwise vacation in tsunami-affected areas.
Then on Dec. 30, a major Taiwanese daily published a criticism of the nation's failed diplomatic strategy. Instead of insisting that Taiwan should quickly join the international rescue efforts based on humanitarian concerns, it asked, "how can Taiwan's aid involvement be a positive engagement of the Thai and Indonesian governments," thus equating humanitarian concerns with potential diplomatic gain.
It is worrisome that some businessmen and opinion leaders are either ignorant, aloof to the suffering of others, or are so selfish that they will try every possible way to gain from others' pain. How can Taiwan claim that it is ready to join the international community -- and expect others to help it with humanitarian or human rights concerns when this country is in need of support?
Chiting Serena Chuang is the International Affairs Director of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers