Koo Chen-fu (
Koo's death was not a big surprise. After all, he had been ill for quite some time. He even once said self-mockingly that he had only one organ left, and could die at any moment.
What deserves our discussion is how his death actually became the biggest news of the day, as both the print and electronic media ran massive reports about it. This shows that he was absolutely extraordinary.
Koo was not only an entrepreneur but also an influential political heavyweight. He had a hand in both the political and business circles, and was considered the best of the best in both.
Although some praised him as a true leader of industry, his greatest achievements lay in his contribution to cross-strait relations. His status would never have been considered so significant without the 1993 meeting with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Daohan (
Koo's death caused a phenomenon. But he himself was also a phenomenon.
He personally suffered political oppression in his early years during the notorious White Terror era.
From the era of the two Chiangs' (
Despite the nation's transition of power in 2000, he was still the only choice for the SEF's chairmanship, and he even stayed on in this post until he died.
We know that the Koo-Wang talks were in fact a historical opportunity for him.
After he died, some people may say that it was just like the disappearance of the Guanglin Verse (
Viewed from a historical perspective, the Koo-Wang meeting formed the last chapter in talks between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Looking back at the private meetings among China's and Taiwan's "secret envoys," the 1993 meeting, and then Chinese president Jiang Zemin's (
And a more important proof: why were cross-strait exchanges and talks halted right after Lee proposed the "special state-to-state dictum" (
In response to the dictum, China issued an official statement to severely warn the "Taiwanese separatist forces." By comparing Beijing's change in attitude, we can immediately see the politics behind its initial politeness, and later arrogance.
Since the Koo-Wang talks can also be seen as the finale of talks between the KMT and the CCP, it is impossible for them to take place again -- with or without Koo.
Moreover, the KMT has become an opposition party, and the DPP's long-term rule has crushed the KMT-CCP framework.
More importantly, it is already impossible for Taiwan to go back to the old path. Both the SEF and a future peace commission have to be aware of the new spirit in this new era.
Chin Heng-wei is the editor-in-chief of the Contemporary Monthly magazine, and a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers