The Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) administration is not having a great time of late, with the recent legislative elections upset compounded by the statement by US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage concerning the US commitment to defend Taiwan.
Armitage was reported to have said during a TV interview that the US was not committed to defend Taiwan if it were attacked by China. The commitment, he maintained, was to sell defensive arms to Taiwan.
He also said that only the US Congress would make the decision to defend it, and not the Bush administration. He also reiterated the US position that "there is only one China, and Taiwan is part of China."
According to Armitage, Taiwan was emerging as a "landmine" in US-China relations.
His boss, Secretary of State Colin Powell, said a few months ago in an interview that Taiwan was not a sovereign nation, and urged both Beijing and Taipei to seek "peaceful reunification."
The obvious question is: What is going on? The answer is that the US is looking after its immediate interests.
The US is bogged down in Iraq. It needs all the help it can get. Therefore, China's support or neutrality in this regard and on the global war on terrorism is very important.
As Professor Amin Saikal, director of the Center for Arab and Islamic Studies at the Australian National University, says: "If the present trends in Iraq endure [over a period of time] the US stands to sustain critical political and economic damage, with an expanding vulnerability to wider opposition within the Arab and Muslim worlds and serious setbacks in the war on terrorism."
Beijing is not unaware of the US predicament and will use it to its advantage.
At the same time, North Korea is proving to be a diplomatic nightmare. The Bush administration has got itself badly entangled in the North Korean nuclear proliferation issue, having threatened the regime with all sorts of consequences when Washington decided to up the ante. But it is not making much headway. What-ever little has so far happened in terms of six-power negotiations (now stalled) was due to Beijing's initiative.
If anything, Pyongyang is becoming more fearful that the US is actively engaged in destabilizing Kim Jong-il's regime. They are not keen on another round of talks.
Georgy Toloraya, research director at the Center for Contemporary Korean Studies in Russia, is of the view that the present regime in North Korea will not collapse like some of the former East European communist states.
According to him, "[North Korea] is not a Stalinist state as commonly reported. It is a combination of Oriental despotism, theocracy and Confucianism -- a bureaucratic monarchy."
Hence, it is tied up in so many knots that unravelling it requires the utmost caution.
If so, Washington will be looking to Beijing even more to solve the North Korean riddle, but cannot if Chen keeps up the pace for Taiwan's formal independence. It is immaterial if Chen is seeking independence or not. Beijing regards him as dangerous and wants Washington to "rein him in." The State Department's panic is clearly reflected in Armitage's remarks that Taiwan is emerging as a sort of land mine in US-China relations.
It is worth noting, though, that the Pentagon doesn't seem to share this sense of panic at the State Department. It continues to cement and develop military ties with Taiwan. As reported in the media, Admiral Thomas Fargo, commander of the US forces in the Pacific, told the Chinese as recently as July that the US wouldn't look the other way if China were to attack Taiwan. Even Armitage stood by the US commitment to sell arms to Taiwan for its defense.
Armitage's message is directed both at China and Taiwan. Beijing is being reassured that Washington is not behind whatever Chen is doing to displease them. And they are indeed trying to "rein him in" by qualifying the US commitment to defend Taiwan. In other words, China is being told not to overreact to Taiwan's internal politics. At the same time, Taipei has been cautioned not to provoke China lest things get out of control.
Taipei's disappointment is quite understandable. After all, it was US President George W. Bush who said in April 2001 that his administration would do "whatever it took" to defend Taiwan. And now the US is softening the message for China. In the process, it is encouraging China to press its advantage.
And where will it end?
For instance, Beijing is angry that the new Japanese defense policy has identified China as a security threat on par with North Korea.
According to its China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue (
China does not like being equated with North Korea as a security threat, calling the claims "totally groundless and extremely irresponsible." Beijing has also urged Tokyo to take "prudent actions in military and security issues."
What is happening is that Japan is trying to emerge as a "normal" nation to carve out its national sphere and assert its national interests. Beijing doesn't like it because this is bound to complicate its ambitions to create its regional "co-prosperity sphere."
Only a humble Japan, weighed down by its wartime crimes, will suit China. But Tokyo is not buying it. Japan will, therefore, be increasingly consigned to visit China's wrath -- the same as Beijing is doing to Taiwan.
Nothing Japan does these days is quite right as far as Beijing is concerned. For instance, Tokyo is under attack for letting former Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) pay a sightseeing visit to Japan. According to a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, this has "severely disturbed" bilateral relations.
Beijing should learn some humility. Budding superpower status is making it dangerously arrogant.
The point is that if China insists on treating Japan as part of its security zone (evident from its submarines and maritime vessels making forays into its waters), the matter is bound to fall at some point under the sphere of the US-Japan security alliance.
Will the US then "rein in Japan" lest its "provocative" behavior adversely affects Sino-US relations?
If so, China will have a foothold on US policy.
It is, therefore, imperative that the US not allow its global strategy to become a hostage to its immediate preoccupations with Iraq, global terrorism and North Korea.
Taiwan is not really the landmine in Sino-US relations.
The real landmine is China's supersized ambition to be the global power.
And if it can edge out the US from defending Taiwan, this will just be the beginning. Japan might be next.
Sushil Seth is a freelance writer based in Sydney.
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS