Taking the natural course
I find Henry Ting's arguments ("Call for a joint China-Taiwan election," Dec. 24, page 8) to be not only logically insane but physically irresponsible to both the Chinese and the Taiwanese people.
First of all, how can a vote amounting to 43.5 percent of the electorate (35.7 for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and 7.8 percent for
the Taiwan Solidarity Union) amount to a "somber defeat" for the pan-green camp? The pan-greens actually gained 2.37 percent compared with the 2000 legislative elections. The pan-blue camp vote, however, lost 2.89 percent this year.
Yes, the outcome was a surprise, but this is democracy. Yes, the political parties lack maturity, but this is a young democracy. Just because
"the current and future US administrations are not going to support an independence movement in Taiwan due to the more pressing urgency of the global anti-terrorist campaign," doesn't mean Taiwan must subscribe to the US standpoint.
To suggest letting the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the DPP, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and others "participate in open and transparent political debates and campaigns to convince people of their plans for the future of China and Taiwan" is political suicide. How could this be beneficial for Taiwan -- politically or economically?
Taiwan has 23 million democratic subjects, as opposed to 1.3 billion oppressed people in China. Taiwan should not have to carry the cross for China. God helps those who help themselves.
The CCP is losing its grip, and one should let nature take its own course. The Chinese people will stand up to the challenge. Meddling in Chinese affairs is not in the best interests of Taiwan, because no one can afford to take Chinese nationalism lightly.
If Ting is suggesting a model similar to that of the EU, shouldn't we first be making sure the 1.3 billion Chinese have their basic human rights before the right to vote -- a privilege hard earned by the Taiwanese.
Ting also fails to understand the Taiwanese people if he thinks the only repercussions of a "united" China is economic. Instead of empowering the Chinese people prematurely, let's help these 1.3 billion people obtain their basic needs first, or else its future democracy will be doomed to fail.
I agree that any military action in the Taiwan Strait will be devastating for both sides. The real question, however,
is "Why must China have Taiwan?"
Lin Shao-huei
Arizona
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past