That Ukrainians will vote for their freedom this weekend is a coincidence of true perfection. For our movement is a triumph, not of mobs but of joyous crowds; of protests, not of looting; of clear purpose, not confusion. As a result, something new will color the habits of those who govern Ukraine from now on: respect for individuals, which is the ultimate check on the abuse of power.
Nothing can ever diminish what was at stake -- and the victory that has been won -- on the streets of Kyev. Ukraine's people have renewed their self-respect through courage and resolution. They have reason to be proud. Self-confidence among the governed and caution among the rulers: these are the psychological springs of democracy and true freedom, and they can never again be diverted in our homeland.
Nobody ever doubted that Ukraine had changed vastly in its twelve years of independence. Yet, caught in the sights of a gun barrel, nobody -- not even the brave men and women who camped in their hundreds of thousands in the snow before Ukraine's parliament -- knew with certainty whether those changes had wrenched Ukrainians from the grip of fear and apathy. The success of their defiance shows the power of the idea that bewilders
outgoing President Leonid Kuchma and his acolytes: that democracy means taking res-ponsibility for one's fate into one's own hands.
The regime clearly expected the crowds that protested the fraudulent election of Nov. 21 to scatter in apathy. They did not. This left the regime to choose between using force to quell the growing resistance or cutting its losses. By refusing to leave the streets and squares of Kyev, Ukraine's mass volunteer army of democrats forced our country's gray old men of the past to retreat into the past.
This is a breakthrough that will endure. For 70 cynical years, and for centuries before that, everything done in the name of Ukrainians was done without our consent. Corrupt regimes, through intimidation and bribery, insisted on the loyalty of the bureaucracy, police and armed services. Newspapers and broadcasts were packed with lies. The Kuchma regime's vast wealth, stolen from ordinary Ukrainians, suggested that the reign of thuggery and deceit could go on forever.
But Ukrainians have now given their seal of approval to democracy and an open society. From now on, the force of ideas, not the force of arms, will win the day.
For once, Karl Marx, the mischievous cause of so much of Ukraine's misery, got something right: "The point," he said about the world, "is to change it."
Of course, our movement was created out of opposition: opposition to corruption, opposition to surrendering our national independence, opposition to the rule of the bully. The joy of opposition is its simplicity; Ukrainians understood what we opposed and stood side by side with us.
Now we must lead a nation in which -- thanks to the cynical ploys and hate-filled rhetoric of a discredited regime -- some sections seem to be set against the democracy we seek to build. But no section of Ukraine is our enemy and none will be treated that way. For we need no reminding of what must be Ukraine's priority. We have shouted it from every platform in the country: end corruption and abuse of power for personal and partisan gain. It is a message carved on our hearts.
Thus, our first task is legal and judicial reform, and here we are given hope by the courage of Ukraine's Supreme Court, which in overturning the stolen election of Nov. 21 upheld the law and the liberties of Ukrainians against a regime determined to sweep them away. So we will resist the temptation of revenge and
retribution. That way lays demoralization and new divisions.
Ruling in the national interest, rather than for the benefit of favored sections or clans, we will apply the law equally to our supporters and our opponents. We will be guided, and bound, by the rule of law -- and the spirit of ordered liberty that animates it.
Of course, immense difficulties remain. The first is repairing our country's unity. Yes, Ukraine has Ukrainian speakers and it has Russian speakers; yes, it has Orthodox and Catholics. But those divisions were manipulated with the same sort of cynicism that Slobodan Milosevic and Franjo Tudjman used to pit Serbs, Croats and Bosnians against each other in the former Yugoslavia.
Ukrainians recoil in anger and horror at the very idea of dividing the nation. Our nation's unity is not artificial. We are united as a people and in our shared history of suffering.
Having laid the foundations of genuine democracy, our house will not be divided by anyone. In renewing our liberties, we will renew our unity. We will renew Ukraine.
Yuliya Tymoshenko is a former deputy prime minister of Ukraine and co-chairman with Viktor Yushchenko of Ukraine's opposition.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past