Everyone is exclaiming in shock and surprise at the results of Taiwan's legislative elections. They cannot figure out how the clueless Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its ally the People First Party (PFP) could have withstood the challenges posed by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Neither foresaw the mood of the majority of Taiwan's people, whose first priorities have long been peace and prosperity.
None of the political parties in Taiwan have a platform or strategy that takes into consideration the aspirations of the middle class. The verdict of this election is not a victory for the pan-blue camp, but rather a somber defeat of the pan-green camp. This political trend will continue to solidify in future elections.
The DPP counted on its ability to fan the fire of passion in its constituents for Taiwan's identity and independence. They woefully failed to realize the majority of people in Taiwan are conservative and middle class, whose major concerns politically are security and economical opportunity. Their concern for peace and prosperity is far more important than the reckless rhetoric about a national referendum and separation from China. They believe that constitutional amendments will not make any difference to their pocketbooks or security.
People in Taiwan are well aware that current and future US administrations are not going to support an independence movement in Taiwan due to the more pressing urgency of the global anti-terrorist campaign.
The elections serve as a wake-up call for Taiwan's political parties to clear their thoughts and pursue a better long-term political objective for Taiwan. Both parties have long ignored that the essence of democracy is to have a clear vision for the well-being of Taiwan's people.
It would be beneficial for Taiwan -- both politically and economically -- to call for a national referendum so that all the people of China and Taiwan can jointly decide important issues affecting them within a certain period of time; for instance, 30 years from now, in 2034.
For these 30 years all political parties -- including the KMT and DPP, as well as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and other political parties and groups -- could be allowed to participate in open and transparent political debates and campaigns to convince people of their plans for the future of China and Taiwan.
Then all the legitimate political parties will be allowed in the year 2034 to test their ideas in a general election for all the people in China and Taiwan.
It is not pure fantasy to say this when you look at China's present political situation, where Hu Jintao (
The KMT would have everything to gain in the long run to seek an eventual power base. The DPP which has a perfect ally in Hong Kong's Democratic Party, which is making a lot of noise for a direct plebiscite by 2007. The party should come to the realization that an independent Taiwan, in this close geographic proximity to China, will never have a chance for a peaceful and stable settlement in the Taiwan Strait. Any wishful thinking for an outright foreign intervention in this part of world is vanishing fast in this international environment of global anti-terrorism.
Both China and Taiwan are in the same predicament. Any outbreak of military conflict in the Taiwan Strait will definitely ruin all the economic achievements made during the last 40 years. As a matter of fact, neither side would ever be able to recover from a war calamity of any size, because of their close economic interdependence in recent years. Of course, the third player with the most to lose from a military confrontation would be the US -- both economically and diplomatically.
If both sides work out a plan giving everybody a political agenda of 30 years to keep the current status quo, the economic harvest will be great when the economy of China is able to catch up to Taiwan. There will be no financial repercussions for Taiwan to merge with China, unlike the unification experience of Germany in 1989 and the proposed Korean unification.
With both sides of the Taiwan Strait members of the WTO and other international organizations, China and Taiwan will be able to solidify their financial foundation, and compete for better living standards and advancements in technology and science.
A new China under the principle of democracy and equality for all could be a possible realityafter the year 2034. Any person with passion for a speedy Chinese recovery will rejoice when the country is back on the right path.
Henry Ting is a political commentator with extensive study and teaching experience at Villanova University.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US