The activities of some hometown friends of the alleged rice bomber Yang Ju-men (
The local community university is setting Yang up as a hero fighting for farmers' rights, adding him to the curriculum and calling for thousands to take to the streets in his support.
But it does not matter how exulted the motivations behind Yang's alleged actions are, nor how good a person he is. Endangering people's lives by planting bombs is a crime.
His character and his actions should not be confused. Yang's friends have even glamorized the bombs by describing them as harmless devices intended to send a message about farmers' rights to the government.
If we accept motivation as a means of justifying criminal acts, then a time bomb set to destroy Taiwan's public safety has already started ticking.
If we agree that seeking to overturn the government is acceptable, then the peace and security that Taiwan currently enjoys will be utterly destroyed.
If we take motivation as the starting point of our argument, then, looked at dispassionately, how different is Yang from Osama bin Laden? Yang allegedly made bombs and placed them in crowded public places as a means of expressing his dissatisfaction with the government's agricultural policy, and to force the policymakers' hand.
Bin Laden claims that his use of terrorism is motivated by a fight for the rights of his compatriots, and that he is willing to sacrifice the lives of thousands of innocent people because it is the only way of directly threatening a superpower like the US.
Both deny that they act in their own interest, but there is no denying that the nature of their terrorist acts is criminal.
Yang has an American precursor in his use of bombs as a means of expressing his dissatisfaction: Timothy McVeigh, whose Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995, was said to have been an act of vengeance for those killed in the 51-day standoff between US law enforcement agencies and members of the Branch Davidian sect in Waco, Texas, on April 19, 1993.
If the tireless efforts of the police had not brought the alleged terrorist activities of Yang to an end, can we be sure that these efforts would have stopped at harmless explosions doing nothing more than sending a message to the government?
Although the "rice bomber" attacks did not harm anyone, the burden they placed on law enforcement agencies for more than a year has indirectly contributed to the suffering of victims from other crimes.
It is difficult for people outside the law enforcement field to understand the enormous resources that were devoted to investigating the rice bomber's 17 attacks.
As most of the bombs were placed in locations with considerable human traffic, such as railway stations and parks, the police were required to increase patrols to look for explosive devices.
For example, when the Democratic Progressive Party organized a huge rally in Taipei's Da-an Forest Park in the run-up to the legislative elections, hundreds of police officers had to be deployed the day before the event to inspect the area for explosive devices, including the thousands of cars parked in the parking lot.
On the day of the rally, police were stationed all around the grounds -- and all because Yang was still at large.
The manpower required for all this was taken off the streets of Taipei, where there were fewer patrols and fewer people working on criminal investigations. The people of Taipei had to pay the price.
Although Yang will not be planting any more bombs, media coverage of the event is likely to lead to copycat crimes, so the real bomb threat has only just begun.
Such criminals will be violating the human rights of the people of Taiwan.
In a democratic Taiwan, we have the right to hold different opinions, and the right to express these opinions should be protected.
But when the expression of these opinions violates public safety, we cannot stand by as people are misled by muddled thinking on this issue.
Sandy Yeh is the director of Continuing Education and Training Center at Central Police University.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95