Looking back over the turbulent year that is now coming to an end, one is tempted to focus on what US leaders have come to call the Greater Middle East. Such a survey would obviously take us to Iraq, to Israel and Palestine -- and to terrorism.
Lasting peace in the Middle East could lead to greater prosperity and cooperation in the world. But if we take a wider view, the problems of the Middle East appear to be but one aspect of deeper shifts among the powers
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
of the world. Indeed, tectonic changes became visible this year. We have begun to see the "powers of the future," to borrow the title of former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt's recent bestselling book.
Schmidt is certain of two developments. The US remains the key player, and China's power will continue to grow. He is less certain about the future of Europe, Russia and the Middle East.
To be sure, this year has seen the confirmation of America's hard power -- and its voters' choice of a politics of values rather than of interests. Americans may not want their soldiers and military hardware in dozens, if not hundreds, of places around the world, but they accept a president who offers simple -- often martial -- certainties.
One may also wonder whether this president could lead them in another direction, to traditional Republican isolationism. After all, it is the Democrats who have traditionally taken the US to war. In any case, security guaranteed by military power will continue to be an American concern.
But while America's hard power dominates the world scene, its soft power declined this year. The US lost some of its attractiveness for many, and Americans are unpopular in many parts of the world. The decline in overseas visitors, and notably in the number of foreign students in the US, is the immediate result of stricter visa laws, but it is an important factor in the weakening of the US' global hegemony.
Soft power begins with economic power. America's twin fiscal and trade deficits may prove to be solvable problems, but new ways will have to be tried to resolve them. At a recent conference, US government representatives were unimpressed by European pleas to do something about the deficits -- and the falling dollar that has resulted from them.
"That is not a European problem," the Americans responded. "It is an issue between us and China."
All at once, China is rapidly emerging as a growing economic force. It not only has considerable dollar reserves, but has also become the manufacturing capital of the world. American and European jobs increasingly migrate to China. Early hints at the reaction could be heard in the American presidential election campaign, with the frequent protests against outsourcing and China's pegged exchange rate. But the trend will not be stopped. It is surely only a matter of time -- a short time -- before China makes its political and military weight felt.
This leaves an uncertain future for Russia and those still in the Russian orbit, like Ukraine. This year witnessed a decline in democracy and the rule of law across what Russian President Vladimir Putin calls the "former Soviet space." The problem is a challenge especially for Europe.
At first sight, this year was a good year for the EU, with enlargement to 25 members completed in May a notable success. Enlargement was not only a triumph for democracy and the rule of law in the postcommunist countries to the west of Russia, but it is also an indication of the magnetism of the EU, and thus of its soft power.
Eastward expansion of the EU enables the New Europe to emulate the economic dynamism of other recent members, like Spain and Ireland. Enlargement has produced a union confident enough to engage more explicitly -- and even with elements of hard power -- in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. It has also provided the courage to open accession negotiations with Turkey.
Yet one cannot help agreeing with Schmidt when he sees Europe's future shrouded in uncertainty. There is no clear recognition of the fact that Europe's soft power means little unless it is allied with the hard power of the US. But there was no progress this year in recreating a transatlantic partnership that recognizes the massive changes occurring in world affairs. Pathetic attempts to go it alone have not made Europe stronger, and anti-Americanism harms Europe more than the US.
Thus, at the end of this year, the most important global task remains unresolved: creation of a confident nucleus for the Free World. An alliance of those who espouse and practice liberal democracy might provide a pole of certainty in a highly uncertain world. Let us hope that next year will bring us a few steps closer to that objective.
Ralf Dahrendorf is a member of the British House of Lords, a former rector of the London School of Economics and a former warden of St. Antony's College, Oxford.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers