Looking back over the turbulent year that is now coming to an end, one is tempted to focus on what US leaders have come to call the Greater Middle East. Such a survey would obviously take us to Iraq, to Israel and Palestine -- and to terrorism.
Lasting peace in the Middle East could lead to greater prosperity and cooperation in the world. But if we take a wider view, the problems of the Middle East appear to be but one aspect of deeper shifts among the powers
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
of the world. Indeed, tectonic changes became visible this year. We have begun to see the "powers of the future," to borrow the title of former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt's recent bestselling book.
Schmidt is certain of two developments. The US remains the key player, and China's power will continue to grow. He is less certain about the future of Europe, Russia and the Middle East.
To be sure, this year has seen the confirmation of America's hard power -- and its voters' choice of a politics of values rather than of interests. Americans may not want their soldiers and military hardware in dozens, if not hundreds, of places around the world, but they accept a president who offers simple -- often martial -- certainties.
One may also wonder whether this president could lead them in another direction, to traditional Republican isolationism. After all, it is the Democrats who have traditionally taken the US to war. In any case, security guaranteed by military power will continue to be an American concern.
But while America's hard power dominates the world scene, its soft power declined this year. The US lost some of its attractiveness for many, and Americans are unpopular in many parts of the world. The decline in overseas visitors, and notably in the number of foreign students in the US, is the immediate result of stricter visa laws, but it is an important factor in the weakening of the US' global hegemony.
Soft power begins with economic power. America's twin fiscal and trade deficits may prove to be solvable problems, but new ways will have to be tried to resolve them. At a recent conference, US government representatives were unimpressed by European pleas to do something about the deficits -- and the falling dollar that has resulted from them.
"That is not a European problem," the Americans responded. "It is an issue between us and China."
All at once, China is rapidly emerging as a growing economic force. It not only has considerable dollar reserves, but has also become the manufacturing capital of the world. American and European jobs increasingly migrate to China. Early hints at the reaction could be heard in the American presidential election campaign, with the frequent protests against outsourcing and China's pegged exchange rate. But the trend will not be stopped. It is surely only a matter of time -- a short time -- before China makes its political and military weight felt.
This leaves an uncertain future for Russia and those still in the Russian orbit, like Ukraine. This year witnessed a decline in democracy and the rule of law across what Russian President Vladimir Putin calls the "former Soviet space." The problem is a challenge especially for Europe.
At first sight, this year was a good year for the EU, with enlargement to 25 members completed in May a notable success. Enlargement was not only a triumph for democracy and the rule of law in the postcommunist countries to the west of Russia, but it is also an indication of the magnetism of the EU, and thus of its soft power.
Eastward expansion of the EU enables the New Europe to emulate the economic dynamism of other recent members, like Spain and Ireland. Enlargement has produced a union confident enough to engage more explicitly -- and even with elements of hard power -- in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. It has also provided the courage to open accession negotiations with Turkey.
Yet one cannot help agreeing with Schmidt when he sees Europe's future shrouded in uncertainty. There is no clear recognition of the fact that Europe's soft power means little unless it is allied with the hard power of the US. But there was no progress this year in recreating a transatlantic partnership that recognizes the massive changes occurring in world affairs. Pathetic attempts to go it alone have not made Europe stronger, and anti-Americanism harms Europe more than the US.
Thus, at the end of this year, the most important global task remains unresolved: creation of a confident nucleus for the Free World. An alliance of those who espouse and practice liberal democracy might provide a pole of certainty in a highly uncertain world. Let us hope that next year will bring us a few steps closer to that objective.
Ralf Dahrendorf is a member of the British House of Lords, a former rector of the London School of Economics and a former warden of St. Antony's College, Oxford.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US