Prudence suggests that not too much be read into the surprisingly inconclusive results of Taiwan's legislative election, because, fundamentally, little has changed and the confrontation with China will persist in jeopardizing the security of East Asia. After the balloting last weekend, President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and its allies ended up with only one more seat, 101, than they had before in the 225-seat legislature. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its partners ended up with 114 seats, one less than before. Independents held the rest.
The outcome was a surprise to Chen, political pundits and much of the foreign press, all of whom had predicted that the pan-green coalition would gain enough seats to have a majority. When that didn't happen, Chen resigned as chairman of his party to take ritual responsibility for its failure.
Much speculation focused on Taiwan's conflict with China, which has been summed up in the phrase "cross-strait relations." Conventional wisdom said the attitude of the voters on this issue would determine their choices.
As the dust has cleared, however, reasons for the outcome have begun to emerge and they seem to have more to do with Taiwan's internal politics than with cross-strait relations. The adage that in a democracy "all politics is local" seems to have been proven once again.
Consequently, the split government means Chen will continue to run into obstacles in his plans to revise the Constitution, use the name "Taiwan" instead of "Republic of China," reorganize the government and make other moves intended to keep Taiwan separate from China and nudge it toward independence.
The president, who has run into acute political adversity before, may trim his sails but is not likely to change course. Chen and his predecessor Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) have molded a strong sense of Taiwanese identity even if a small majority think the status quo ought to be preserved for now.
The restrained initial response from Beijing suggests that the communist government there was caught by surprise and is uncertain about what the outcome meant. Even so, China's Xinhua news agency contended that the vote demonstrated "the unpopularity of the leader's obstinate separatist stance."
"The voters were alarmed by Chen's rash lurch toward independence, especially his plan to change the name of Taiwan's overseas representative offices," Xinhua argued.
Those offices are quasi-embassies in nations, including the US, that lack diplomatic relations with Taiwan.
In light of that stance, there's not much hope that Beijing will soften its policies toward Taiwan. The authorities apparently believe their hard line helped to bring about Taiwan's election results and therefore they should stick to it and move on with their military buildup. Washington was cool toward the election results after having cautioned Chen that he was going too far too fast and might provoke a military attack from China. Despite those cautions, many senior officials in the Bush administration are reported to favor a Taiwan separated from China and possibly independent.
US State Department spokesman Richard Boucher, asked to comment on the Taiwanese election, told reporters: "They had a successful election. That's a good thing. We're glad to see it. What they decide to do within their political system now on some of these issues is going to be decided in Taiwan."
US military officials have been delivering two messages to Taiwan and China. Noting that a US$18 billion arms purchase from the US has been held up by the KMT in Taiwan's legislature, US officers have told the Taiwanese they must do more to help themselves if they expect the US to come to their rescue in the event of an assault from China. On the other side, US officials have repeatedly warned China not to miscalculate. They have told Beijing's military leaders that US military forces will respond with sufficient power to prevail in the ensuing hostilities if China mounts an unprovoked attack on Taiwan.
In domestic politics, the DPP evidently failed to adopt tactics suited to Taiwan's electoral system. In addition, the KMT, which had dominated Taiwan's politics for decades, has far more money in its coffers than does the DPP, a comparative newcomer to the scene. And, as in most democratic nations, citizens voted with their pocket books. Chen had evidently not fulfilled his economic promises to the voters and he paid for it at the polls.
Richard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US