English remains the language of choice among the children and grandchildren of Hispanic immigrants, despite continuing waves of migration from Latin America and concerns from some analysts that English may lose ground to Spanish in some parts of the US, a new analysis of census data shows.
The study, conducted by researchers at the State University of New York at Albany (SUNY-Albany), is the latest foray in a fierce debate about whether the continuing stream of immigration from Latin America will challenge traditional assimilation patterns charted by the descendants of European migrants.
Researchers say the descendants of most European immigrants who arrived in the late 19th and 20th centuries became exclusively English-speakers within three generations. In recent years, some people have questioned whether the descendants of Hispanic immigrants will follow suit, given the surging numbers of Spanish-speaking
arrivals and the emphasis on
multiculturalism and increased globalization.
The study, which examined data from the 2000 census, found that most Hispanic-Americans were also moving steadily toward English monolingualism. The report found that 72 percent of Hispanic children who were third-generation or later spoke English exclusively.
The report suggested that the trend had generally continued among Mexican-Americans, the country's largest immigrant group, even during the immigration boom of the 1990s. In 1990, 64 percent of third- and later-generation Mexican-American children spoke only English at home, the study showed. By 2000, that figure had risen to 71 percent.
Richard Alba, director of the Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research at SUNY-Albany, says the study suggests that many people have underestimated the pressures of assimilation, which continue to drive immigrants and their descendants toward English as they seek success in the US mainstream.
Even for Hispanics in Los Angeles, a magnet for immigration from Latin America, the pattern of language shifts across generations remained similar to those among Hispanics nationally, he said.
"A number of people, whether from the left or the right, are underplaying the contemporary signs of assimilation," Alba said. "They are viewing American society as much more fractured along ethnic and cultural lines than really appears to be the case. There are fault lines, but they are not as deep as people think."
Alba uncovered some notable exceptions to the trend, finding that larger percentages of Hispanics maintained bilingualism in the third generation than did their earlier European counterparts. Such bilingualism mainly occurs in communities along the Mexican border, where Spanish has been widely spoken for generations, and among Dominican immigrants who maintain close ties to their home country, the study found.
Samuel Huntington, a professor of political science at Harvard who touched off a furor this year by warning that continuing high levels of Hispanic immigration might "eventually change America into a country of two languages, two cultures and two peoples," said he agreed with Alba's findings.
But he said that Alba's study reflected the experiences of the descendants of Hispanic immigrants who arrived in the 1960s, when the large waves of Latin American migration to the US were just beginning. He said the study did little to predict the experiences of the grandchildren of more recent Hispanic arrivals.
Last year, about 33 million foreign-born people lived in the US, accounting for nearly 12 percent of the population, census statistics show. Fifty-three percent of those immigrants were born in Latin America and half had arrived since 1990.
"We had this huge increase of immigration in the 1980s and 1990s: what will the grandchildren of these immigrants be like?" Huntington said. "How will they balance their conflicting identities as Hispanics, Mexicans and Americans? It's going to be a very different situation. You can't simply assume that this third generation that will emerge in a couple of decades is like the third generation that exists now."
"If current trends continue," Huntington continued, "we will move in the direction of becoming a bilingual society. Is that going to be a disaster? Not necessarily. But it will make us a different country than we have been in the past."
Alba said available statistics did not suggest a substantive change in historical patterns. His view was echoed by Ruben Rumbaut, co-director of the Center for Research on Immigration, Population and Public Policy at the University of California, Irvine.
Rumbaut, who was a co-director of the largest multiyear survey of the children of immigrants, said his findings showed that continued bilingualism among Hispanics did not occur at the expense of English.
"It's additive, not subtractive," Rumbaut said. "English is still overwhelmingly preferred, even by Mexican-born young people who came as young children and are living on the border."
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US