Early last month, a Chinese submarine entered Japanese territorial waters in the vicinity of Okinawa, raising tension between the two nations. Not long afterward, Japan announced that it would be reducing financial aid to China. These two incidents have caused turmoil in Sino-Japanese diplomatic relations.
A week after the of discovery of the submarine, Beijing came out and admitted it was indeed theirs, and although there was no formal apology, China's response was regarded by Japan as sincere.
Subsequently, President Chen Shui-bian (
that information about the submarine's presence in Japanese waters had been provided by Taiwan. This was done in a manner to emphasize the close intelligence ties between Taiwan and Japan, but the "revelation" touched a nerve in the Japanese political establishment and it was immediately denied by the Japanese government.
According to the Japanese account of events, the submarine had been spotted a number of days before its incursion into Japan's territorial waters. The submarine was in Japanese waters for only about two hours, but this was the first time that such an incursion had taken place (as far as we know) and may have been due to technical difficulties, as the Chinese claimed.
In recent years there have been numerous incidents of North Korean spy ships, Chinese surveillance craft and submarines in the vicinity of Japan. These have posed new challenges for the nation's defense apparatus. This is especially true in light of China's double-digit economic growth, massive spending on its military and obvious aspirations to become a naval power. All this has made Japan rethink national defense strategy.
But Japan has been hampered by its so-called pacifist Constitution, so that even possession of a strong navy would be of little use.
Areas of overlap exist regarding China and Japan's claims to resource-rich maritime areas. Recently, China has been cooperating with multinational firms to search for natural gas in the East China Sea, which has been the source of much anxiety in Japan. The problems associated with sovereignty over the Diaoyutai islands are also a result of competition over resources. Both China and Japan are major importers of energy, and the competition for safe passage and security of resources from the East China Sea, Taiwan Strait, South China Sea down to the Indian Ocean, will only intensify.
In this situation, for Japan to provide aid to China is peculiar and the Japanese people cannot understand why its government has provided long-term aid to a nuclear-armed nation that is not only constantly strengthening its military, but is not even particularly friendly to Japan.
In fact, when Japan's foreign aid program was launched in 1958, the first recipient of its aid was India, but because of the Cold War, the relationship became increasingly distant. China's position, on the other hand, became increasingly important, and today the Japanese economy is highly dependant on China, and is even seen as a means of economic recovery. Japan will certainly seek to maintain whatever friendship there may be with China.
The 1995 Taiwan Strait crisis was a turning point for Sino-Japanese relations and caused the Japanese to adjust the terms of their mutual defense treaty with the US. China's "rising" has also influenced strategic thinking in Asia and given a new dimension to Taiwan's strategic value, which has created considerable space for joint security cooperation between the US, Japan and Taiwan. But this cooperation should be planned cautiously and implemented in an unobtrusive manner. Ostentatiousness will be counterproductive.
It is a pity that Japan is a major power in economic terms, yet is not very significant in diplomatic terms. For this reason, annual discussions on defense cooperation between Japan and the US tend to revolve around trivial issues. The same can be said of relations between Taiwan and Japan, for although the two countries have close ties, the many dialogues and exchanges lack direction and clear goals. There is a sense of weariness about it all.
In announcing that Taiwan had a hand in detecting the Chinese submarine, Chen sought to underline Taiwan's relationship with Japan. But such a bold move may not be beneficial to relations between the two nations.
Antonio Chiang is a former deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers