The International Cooperation and Development Fund is training Mongolian owners of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), so that they can learn from this country's development of such businesses. The training program is being offered under the auspices of the the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development's Mongolia Cooperation Fund.
This is the very first international cooperation case between Taiwan and the bank in the face of China's diplomatic oppression. In terms of Taiwan's foreign assistance activities, it has turned the nation from a donor to an executor of aid projects. It is a diplomatic breakthrough with deep meaning for the nation's foreign-assistance programs.
The bank established the Mongolia Cooperation Fund in 2001 with 10.3 million euros (NT$439 million) in contributions from Japan (5 million euros), the Netherlands (3.3 million euros) and 1 million euros each from Luxembourg and Taiwan. The Mongolian fund assists that nation in implementing economic and legal reforms, so that its transformation into a market economy can proceed smoothly.
While the size of Taiwan's donation is relatively small, the development of small and medium-sized businesses in this country has been praised by the bank. This has helped offset the gap between advanced countries and those that receive their funding.
Taiwan's cultivation of SMEs and the development of its information industry and precision agricultural techniques are all areas the government can focus on in future foreign aid projects as well as being vehicles for creating diplomatic breakthroughs. These are also areas in which Beijing lags behind Taipei.
In future, therefore, it should be possible for Taiwan to rely on the experience of its own economic development and strength to propose cooperation programs in international economic organizations based on our economic superiority. The government could use its aid money to facilitate the integration of more international resources to implement foreign aid programs and turn Taiwan into a new force for international economic cooperation and development.
This would also create more room for diplomatic activities, and the nation would no longer have to worry about Chinese pressure and isolation.
The suggestions made by Taiwan at APEC's Small and Medium Enterprises Working Group have been praised every year by other members. This is a great example of using Taiwan's economic strength at international events. The Mongolian fund experience is a good example for the foreign and economic affairs ministries to follow. Those ministries should become more confident and active when making suggestions to international economic organizations to highlight Taiwan's unique economic abilities. This would help show that Taiwan's development experience could be used as a reference for developing countries and raise the nation's international profile.
Many advanced countries, including Japan and Australia, use a combination of diplomacy and aid in their international relations, and have, therefore, been able to make their presence felt both politically and commercially on the international stage. In the 1950s and 1960s, Taiwan was known for sending agricultural teams to Africa and the South Pacific. Taiwan now has another opportunity to use its diligence and wisdom to act globally, paving the way for further economic diplomacy.
For this reason, it is necessary for the aid agencies taking part in the Mongolian project to make the best use they can of this rare opportunity, formulating their curriculum so that the Mongolian delegation will find their time in Taiwan useful and thereby helping boost Taiwan's international reputation.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers