The incursion of a Chinese nuclear-powered submarine into Japanese territorial waters this month has illuminated a mounting competition under the surface of the Pacific and Indian Oceans and their adjacent seas.
The chief rivals for submarine supremacy in this region are China, which has given priority to submarines as it acquires a blue-water or deep-sea navy, and the US, which is rebuilding submarine capabilities that had atrophied after the Cold War.
China and the US are not alone. North Korea has a sizeable coastal submarine force and South Korea has begun to counter it. Japan has a modest but proficient fleet.
Taiwan is pondering the procurement of eight boats that would triple the size of its force. The city-state of Singapore has three submarines and is acquiring a fourth. Australia has six modern submarines, based on a Swedish design, for surveillance in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
In South Asia, India has been acquiring a submarine fleet with Russian help. A specialist on South Asia, Donald Berlin of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in Hawaii, has written that India will also build six to twelve French-designed submarines and is working on a nuclear-powered boat that will go to sea in 2006.
Pakistan has launched two submarines and is constructing a third. Berlin says "Pakistan will likely want a submarine-based nuclear weapons delivery system" to deter India. Iran has several submarines.
Even Israel, usually considered a Mediterranean nation, is believed to have sent submarines armed with cruise missiles through the Red Sea into the Indian Ocean to deter a potential nuclear attack by Iran.
In contrast, Russia, which once deployed 90 submarines into the Pacific, has laid up all but 20 boats because of that nation's financial distress.
"They've held onto their more capable boats," said a US official with access to intelligence reports, but their operations are constricted.
The Chinese submarine in Japanese waters was one of five Han class boats, the first of China's nuclear-powered submarines. After she left port at Ningbo, she was detected by Taiwan as she steamed east, then by the US near Guam in the central Pacific, and finally by Japan after she turned north to steam near Okinawa.
After a Japanese protest, Chinese spokesmen expressed regrets and blamed the mistake on unexplained "technical difficulties," raising questions about Chinese seamanship; the Chinese have long had problems operating submarines.
China is acquiring submarines to "patrol the littorals, blockade the Taiwan Strait, and stalk [US] aircraft carriers," say two researchers, Lyle Goldstein and Bill Murray, at the Naval War College in Rhode Island.
China, which has 50 submarines in two older classes, began expanding 10 years ago when it bought four Russian "Kilo" submarines, then ordered eight more in 2002 for delivery starting next year.
The Chinese are producing the "Song" class of attack boats armed with cruise missiles. Training has been intensified throughout the fleet.
It is in the Taiwan Strait that Chinese and US submarines would most likely clash if China seeks to blockade or invade Taiwan, the country over which it claims sovereignty but whose people prefer to remain separate.
US submarines would go into action because Taiwan lacks sufficient anti-submarine weapons to break a blockade or stop an invasion. The US policy is to help defend Taiwan from an unprovoked assault by China.
In the US, the commander of the Pacific Fleet, Admiral Walter Doran, has made the revival of submarine warfare his top priority and has set up a special staff to oversee that resurgence. The Navy has recently established an anti-submarine warfare center in San Diego to improve training and readiness.
The US has moved two submarines from Hawaii to Guam and will add a third to base them closer to operating areas. Where 60 percent of US submarines operated in the Atlantic during the Cold War and 40 percent in the Pacific, the Navy is planning to reverse that ratio.
Attack submarines whose mission after the Cold War was to launch cruise missiles at land and sea targets and to gather intelligence have been assigned anew the task of fighting other submarines since the best anti-submarine weapon is another submarine.
Six "SURTASS" ships (Surveillance Towed-Array Sensor System) that use powerful sonar to detect submarines in vast areas of deep water have now been assigned to the Pacific. Four ballistic missile submarines are being converted to carry 150 cruise missiles each and to infiltrate 100 commandos onto hostile beaches.
Concluded a US official: "Once again, the value of stealth is being recognized."
Richard Halloran is a freelance journalist based in Hawaii.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US