It has been 110 years since the establishment of the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) predecessor, the Society for Regenerating China, in Honolulu in November 1894. From Sun Yat-sen (
Among the five, former president Chiang Kai-shek (
If Lien resigns when his term expires early next year, the length of his chairmanship will be about four years. Since the older Chiang's death, the length of the KMT chairman's term has obviously been shrinking. Compared to the younger Chiang and Lee, Lien has only enjoyed a short chairmanship, because the party has been losing its power. Still, his four-year term is actually longer than that of any Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman.
From now on, if a KMT chairperson is elected president, then he or she may enjoy a four-year chairmanship. If the person is re-elected again, then he or she may enjoy an eight-year chairmanship.
For the DPP, if a president still has to serve concurrently as chairperson, then the chairmanship of President Chen Shui-bian (
Looking back at the 18-year history of the DPP, there have been eight chairmen, each serving for an average of two-and-a-quarter years. Among the eight, Huang Hsin-chieh (黃信介) served two terms for a total of two years. After each term was extended from one to two years, Hsu Hsin-liang (
As for Lien, he will be unable to keep the chairmanship for long, unless he can win the lawsuits to nullify both the presidential election and election results. His stepping down will be a turning point for the KMT's transformation into a real democratic party, and for Taiwan's further democratization as well.
By looking at the numbers of chairmen of major parties and the length of their terms, we can clearly see the historical development of Taiwan's democratization. Both the KMT and PFP have failed to build democratic party systems to this day. This is an obstacle to our democratization. Hopefully, the two can get rid of their autocratic leadership soon, so as to embrace democratic party systems.
Chiu Hei-yuan is professor of sociology at National Taiwan University and a member of the Taipei Society.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past