The Ministry of Education's curriculum guidelines for senior high history textbook have recently been released -- to the delight of some and the chagrin of others. No matter what, the seeds of Taiwanese consciousness have been sown in the education system.
As the Chinese saying goes, "It takes 10 years to grow a tree, and 100 years before a sound education program takes root." This is where it begins.
In the larger scheme of things, the new text places Taiwan's history alongside Chinese and world history. No longer will Taiwan's history be regarded as being a subsidiary of Chinese history.
From a more local perspective, we see Taiwan's history escaping from the confines of "party-state history," breaking away from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-endorsed myths and finally bringing out the truth of events like the White Terror and the misfortune that Taiwan suffered due to the battle between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The most interesting aspect, which has the appeal of being a false accusation being overturned, has to do with the Cairo Declaration. In 1945, Chiang Kai-shek (
Why didn't the Cairo conference produce any official conclusion? This was mainly because British foreign minister Antony Eden was against returning Taiwan to China, and the document given to Chiang by the official representing China, Wang Chunghui (王寵惠), made this plain. (This document can be found in Important Historical Records of the Republic of China edited by Chin Hsiao-yi [秦孝儀]).
This is why the meeting in Cairo produced nothing more than a communique (even though it is often referred to as a "declaration"). It was not a signed treaty and simply stated the matters discussed. The KMT twisted history and tampered with evidence, creating a "Cairo Declaration" that fitted their purposes with the aim of making the statement that "Japan relinquishes sovereignty over Taiwan" into "Taiwan's sovereignty reverts to China."
The new high school text books will do nothing more than tell the truth. And this hasn't come easily. It has taken constant calls from concerned people to finally penetrate the lies of the KMT and the "two Chiangs."
It is interesting to note that Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英久) has not made any statement on his position regarding the Cairo Declaration. He has taken aim elsewhere, using the Shanghai Communique and some other documents as his weapons to deflect the argument that Taiwan's status is still unclear.
The problem is that once you accept the three Sino-US Joint Communiques, this is tantamount to accepting that the Republic of China (ROC) no longer exists. Ma, who has sworn to defend the ROC to the death, has basically denied the existence of this entity.
Former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Taiwan is Taiwan, China is China. There is one country on either side of the Taiwan Strait. This is the fact, and it should not surprise anybody.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers