The Seventh asia Pacific Conference on Korea Studies was held at Chinese Culture University last month. When delivering a speech on the opening day of the international event, President Chen Shui-bian (
More than 20 years ago, I also attended a conference on Taiwan Studies when I was abroad. But it was a meeting of fewer than 50 people, with a focus on Taiwan's role in international politics at that time. The meaning of the term Taiwan Studies proposed by Chen is more like that of Korea Studies, which includes a nation's history, language, literature, art, culture, education, technology, economy and politics.
In other words, Taiwan Studies is about Taiwan's overall development, and its unique contributions to the world over the past few decades, and even centuries. In particular, it is about a series of touching stories of how Taiwan has integrated the continental and marine cultures in Asia, how it absorbed the essence of the East and West, and how it finally created the cultural, political, and economic patterns of the "Oriental Switzerland."
Chen's call for an international conference on Taiwan Studies was not made on impulse. In fact, not every country is qualified to hold such a conference in light of certain requirements.
First, international image: Taiwanese across the world have built an image of intelligence, friendliness and peace. Second, global contributions: Taiwan's economic miracle in the 1970s and the development of its high-tech industry have pushed its computers and other products onto the international stage.
Third, national competitiveness: Taiwan has always been highly competitive internationally. This year, according to the annual Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005 published by the World Economic Forum, Taiwan ranked No. 4 in the world and No. 1 in Asia in competitiveness.
Fourth, cultural qualities: Taiwan is actually a cultural melting pot that surpasses time and space -- with a mixture of Aborigine Malay culture, Chinese, Dutch, Spanish and Western European cultures, and the 50-year Japanese colonialism and another 50 years of Chinese cultural influence.
Fifth, public support: even if all these conditions are met, it will be very difficult to hold a conference without public support. Therefore, we may need a warming-up period, during which we can establish a preparation office for such a conference, define its scope and content and provide information to educate the public.
I can't help but think of the sorrow of being a Taiwanese. Why do the Taiwanese people study other countries in universities when they do not even understand the history, geography and literature of their own country? The Ministry of Education has launched the course "Knowing Taiwan" in junior high schools. In addition to the poorly-compiled textbooks, the participation of teachers and schools in the subject is usually low. There is still a long way to go before we are capable of holding an international conference on Taiwan Studies.
I believe that we need to include more general education courses that are similar to "Knowing Taiwan" in our universities. Such courses should focus on people's lives, such as Taiwanese literature, languages, slang and songs that are easier to study. Plus, the combination of the subject "Digital Taiwan" and the nation's geographical and meteorological information is also an important field.
Hopefully, this article can bring more attention to the significance of Taiwan Studies, so that we can hold an international conference on the subject soon.
Franklin Lee is the dean of the School of Engineering at Chinese Culture University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers