Taiwan's political instability originates in the media and the Legislative Yuan, while media and legislative instability originates in the uncertain political situation. The situation prior to the transition of power in 2000, when politicians staged shows aimed at gaining media attention, has changed. Pan-blue politicians now oppose anything that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) does and anything that has to do with Taiwan and localization.
The accusation by People First Party (PFP) Legislator Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄) and others that Chen gave former Panamanian president Mireya Moscoso a "birthday present" -- a check for US$1 million -- as a "settlement fee" to cover up "improper dealings" is a typical example of collusion between certain political and media circles.
Liu and the others first heard this information in a radio program hosted by UFO Radio chairman Jaw Shao-kang (趙少康). They went on to conjecture that the check was a settlement fee to cover up improper behavior on Chen's part. The original "red envelope" allegation, however, came from Huanqiu Shibao, which is owned by the Chinese Communist Party newspaper People's Daily. Huanqiu Shibao has a close relationship with China's military and a clear anti-Taiwan and anti-US stance. Birds of the same feather, pro-China media in Taiwan are also spreading rumors to hurt the country. The PFP and the New Party, where Liu and Jaw respectively came to prominence, make up the most China-friendly part of the blue camp.
PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) clearly understood the seriousness of the incident. When Liu was still busy talking his nonsense, proclaiming that he would file a counter lawsuit, Soong came out to end things and then apologized together with Liu. Yet they continued to make reference to money politics, secret diplomatic aid and so on in an attempt to shift the focus of attention.
Jaw, less remorseful than Liu, is relying on a tendency for media figures to get off the hook by referring to "freedom of the press." His political wisdom is vastly inferior to Soong's, but Jaw is canny enough to have pulled out of politics.
There are several reasons why Soong fears that this issue will be detrimental to the PFP.
First, the use of false information from China to attack Taiwan's already very difficult diplomatic situation unambiguously painted the PFP as being on China's side. Continuing in this fashion will only clarify and reinforce this pro-China stance, and although it will earn the party a good grade from China, it is certain to place them at a disadvantage in December's legislative elections.
Second, the success in converting news of a "red envelope" into slandering Chen for an "improper relationship" with Moscoso reflected the base nature of Liu's attitudes and language, as well as a sexist way of thinking that could lead to a loss of votes from women.
Third, the incident ran the risk of becoming a diplomatic incident. Fortunately for the PFP, Moscoso reversed her decision to file a lawsuit. Had the incident degenerated further and Moscoso tried to hold Huanqiu Shibao to account, it would have become more embarrassing for the PFP.
The object chosen by pro-China politicians and media for their attack is the same topic that China would use were it to make a combined domestic and external attack on Taiwan's reputation.
The acts of these politicians are nothing less than an attempt to collaborate with China to wrestle back lost power. Voters should protect the nation's interests and throw these politicians out of the legislature, thus denying them a powerful vehicle for creating disorder in Taiwan -- the very disorder which China is waiting to capitalize on.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers