An unprecedented merger battle to create the world's largest bank by assets is serving as a test case for how far Japan has come in transparency and competition and how much influence individual shareholders will wield, analysts said.
With months to go before a still uncertain outcome, the battle of the banks is drawing global attention as foreigners put more money into Japan and the government mulls further opening mergers and acquisitions to international players.
Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group, the most profitable of Japan's four megabanks, and fourth-largest bank UFJ Holdings announced in mid-July they would negotiate to merge.
But by the end of July, what in the old Japan would have been a straight-forward and government-blessed acquisition of a weaker firm by a stronger one took an entirely different turn.
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, which would be relegated into third and last place among Japan's megabanks if the Mitsubishi Tokyo-UFJ merger becomes reality, made a unsolicited counteroffer.
"Much of this, if not all, would have taken the form of a backroom deal in erstwhile Japan," said Noriko Hama, professor at the management school of Doshisha University in Kyoto.
"Keeping up appearances used to mean hiding things in corporate Japan. Now it looks as though the emphasis has shifted to appearing transparent and shareholder friendly," Hama said.
"Yet it remains to be seen how far content matches appearances," she said.
In August, even after Mitsubishi Tokyo and UFJ had announced their wedding date of October next year, Sumitomo Mitsui made an offer of one of its shares for each of UFJ's -- a generous offer to a troubled bank -- and promised a cash infusion of ?700 billion (US$6.5 billion).
Mitsubishi responded by actually injecting the same sum into UFJ just in time for the closing of the half-year books at the end of last month.
But it came with a so-called "poison pill" by which Mitsubishi, in the event of a hostile bid for UFJ, could convert its shares into voting stock to prevent a takeover. Mitsubishi did not reveal its merger ratio.
UFJ called on its shareholders to side with Mitsubishi Tokyo through an open letter published in the Nihon Keizai Shimbun business daily and in the international press -- another unprecedented event in Japan.
The open hostility between the banks in Japan's orderly business culture and authorities' discreetness in the very public affair are both novel in Japan.
And more surprises could be in store, as Sumitomo Mitsui has delayed until the end of June next year its deadline for UFJ to accept its offer.
"Considering Sumitomo Mitsui's attitude up until now, you can't rule out more fireworks," said a European specialist on the banking sector who declined to be named.
Sumitomo Mitsui could make a hostile bid for UFJ, which would be a first in Japan's banking sector.
"Given the certain daredevilry -- for a Japanese bank, that is -- in their company psyche, they [Sumitomo Mitsui] might consider it worthwhile to appear to be the innovator in this competition," Hama said.
Or UFJ's foreign shareholders, who represent an unusually large 30 percent of its capital, could revolt and demand more information from Mitsubishi Tokyo or require UFJ to pay more attention to the offer by Sumitomo Mitsui.
"Naturally foreign shareholders are likely to become a bit more vocal and have a bigger say just because their shareholdings have gone up," said Ned Akov, a banking sector analyst at Macquarie Research.
Japan is studying making acquisitions through share exchanges open to foreign companies, in a proposed amendment to the commercial code to be drafted by February, a justice ministry official said.
But for the moment some hurdles could still "blunt the apparent intent of the reform" such as the current "less favorable tax treatment for share to share acquisitions by foreign firms," said Richard Jerram, chief economist at Macquarie.
And according to an economy ministry official new measures are being studied to prevent hostile bids.
Jerram said in a recent commentary that the plan was being silently delayed and that he was "skeptical about any timetable for reforms" in Japan.
A Japanese government official confirmed that "if we reach the conclusion that current proposals cannot be achieved, it is possible that the amendment will not be put forth."
In a sign of Japan's wariness about making acquisitions by foreign firms easier, the Nihon Keizai recently wrote that such a change would force more Japanese firms to take measures against hostile bids.
The course of the UFJ saga, even if not directly involving foreign companies, will reveal much about the future of mergers and acquisitions in Japan.
Whichever company ends up with UFJ will see a huge increase in its size and "neither can allow the other to get away with the prize," Hama said.
"UFJ the laggard has suddenly become UFJ the desirable. This is the irony of being the weakest among the largest," she said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US