The Taiwan Strait has often come in the international media spotlight, as many people throughout the world fear that tensions between Taiwan and China might intensify to an unmanageable degree. As one of the countries at the center of this gathering storm, it is in Taiwan's own interests, as well as those of other parties, to present some of the facts pertinent to this matter and to make its policies clear to the international community.
\nThe situation across the Strait is more complicated than usually presented by the media, and it is necessary to take into consideration the numerous interrelated dimensions if a clear picture is to be seen. These include the military and diplomatic confrontations, parallel historical developments and economic interdependence of the two sides. At the center of this complex intersection of conflicting elements, Taiwan would also like the international community to understand that the pursuit of peace is its paramount objective.
\nFirst dimension: Military buildup and diplomatic confrontation
\nIt is known from a number of widely available sources that China's military budget began to expand rapidly in 1994, and has had double-digit growth in almost every year since. This is far in excess of China's economic growth rate and, by comparison, Taiwan's military budget has stagnated. Taking last year as an example, according to the Beijing authorities' own published figures, China's military budget topped US$23 billion, which is almost three times the figure spent on defense by Taiwan. This fact alone provides a number of reasons for concern.
\nMuch of China's growing military budget has been spent on foreign procurement, including Su-27 and Su-30 fighter jets, Sovremenny-class destroyers, Kilo-class submarines and other advanced weapon systems. China's deployment of missiles is also a cause for worry, with around 550 short- to mid-range ballistic missiles targeting Taiwan from the southeastern coastal region. Some in Washington have been moved to describe China's missile deployment as the most destabilizing factor in the region. In addition to these increasingly accurate, traditional ballistic missiles, China has also been developing, and possibly deploying, multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) and cruise missiles, thus further destabilizing the situation.
\nIn such circumstances, Taiwan's most immediate need is to prevent this military imbalance from tilting so far that China thinks it can use force against its tiny neighbor without the fear of an effective defense force. In order to prevent the cross-strait military situation from deteriorating further, Taiwan's government is moving to strengthen its defense, which explains its attempts to pass a special budget for necessary air, submarine, and missile defense capabilities.
\nOf similar seriousness to this military buildup and, perhaps, even more destabilizing due to the strong emotions involved, is the confrontation in the diplomatic arena. Taiwan's existence, under the formal national title of the Republic of China (ROC), is denied by the People's Republic of China (PRC), which claims sovereignty over Taiwan. It has proclaimed that there is only one China, that the PRC represents China and that Taiwan is but a province of the PRC. It uses this "one China principle" to exclude Taiwan from international affairs, causing much antagonism among the people of Taiwan, and resulting in feelings of hostility towards China, as is repeatedly shown in public opinion surveys.
\nOne example that illustrates this point occurred on July 23, 2002. On the eve of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) swearing in as chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the PRC announced that Nauru, one of Taiwan's diplomatic allies in the South Pacific, was switching diplomatic ties from Taipei to Beijing. It later emerged that China had "bought" this allegiance with US$137 million in economic aid, for a country of only 10,700 citizens. This move and the timing of its announcement were unambiguously intended to humiliate Taiwan and its democratically elected president. Although the international community paid little attention, the government and people of Taiwan were deeply affected.
\nAs of this summer, Taiwan has not detected any sign or trend suggesting that China has reversed, or even slowed, its strategy of diplomatically isolating Taiwan. Indeed, in the first half of the year, the Beijing authorities seem to have been working hard to woo Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Latin America. The PRC has even threatened to cut the UN's aid to those countries maintaining diplomatic relations with Taiwan. If China starts to tighten its grip on these nations, it will initiate a new round of crisis across the Strait.
\nInterdependence in non-political areas
\nIn contrast to this military buildup and diplomatic confrontation, economic integration and cultural exchanges across the Strait present a dramatically different picture. For humanitarian reasons, in 1987 the government started to allow its citizens the right, albeit limited, to visit relatives in China. In the 17 years since this first opening up, travel between the two sides has mushroomed. There have been a total of 31 million visits by Taiwan's people to China, averaging around 3 million visits annually in recent years. In the same period, PRC citizens have made more than 1 million visits to Taiwan. This is just one small but significant example of the reality that lies behind what is widely perceived as the Taiwan-China tension.
\nCross-strait trade has also expanded year-on-year, reaching US$46.3 billion last year. China accounts for around one quarter of Taiwan's export market and about 17 percent of Taiwan's total international trade. Some people have even suggested that these high levels of trade with the PRC make Taiwan too dependent on China.
\nMoreover, Taiwanese investment in China has increased tremendously, amounting cumulatively to at least US$70 billion. This represents around half of all Taiwan's direct overseas investment and, in recent years, has risen to more than 60 percent of total outbound investment.
\nMany have speculated that this acceleration of capital flow to China over recent years has been driven by Taiwan's higher labor costs. While previously this may have been the case, analysis of the latest Taiwanese investments in China show that there has been a shift from labor-intensive manufacturing to more capital- and technology-intensive production. Furthermore, careful examination of recent large investment projects shows a clear and successful division of labor with Taiwanese working on innovation and design while Chinese concentrate on manufacturing and exporting.
\nAfter taking up the reins of government in May 2000, DPP leaders adopted a series of liberalization policies aimed at improving cross-strait exchanges. These included setting up direct transportation links between China's southeast coast and Kinmen and Matsu, liberalizing the "go slow, be patient" policy, preparing for future direct shipping and air transportation links, permitting Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan, and allowing charter flights to China.
\nThe government also allowed specialists in a variety of fields to visit Taiwan, universities to use textbooks written in China's simplified characters, and China's media to station journalists in Taiwan. These measures were all aimed at increasing mutual understanding and bringing reason to the previously confrontational atmosphere of cross-strait relations. Nevertheless, many international observers, hearing the Beijing authorities' harsh language and seeing their threats and preparations for war, still conclude that the Taiwan Strait is potentially one of the most explosive flashpoints in the world.
\nDespite China's rapid social and economic changes, there has not yet been an equivalent political transformation towards a more responsive system. Moreover, because of the lack of democratic rules regarding any change in leadership, there are increasing indications that serious competition is fermenting between rival political factions.
\nAs usual, competition for power within the PRC expresses itself in the form of policy debate. this year, this debate seems to be focused on the issue of Taiwan, as well as the related question of how to deal with the US in the face of improving Taiwan-US ties.
\nAs this debate progresses, Taiwan's leadership is being used as a scapegoat and its policies are twisted to fit the theory that Taiwan is ill-intentioned and, therefore, that Beijing must adopt a hostile posture when dealing with Taiwan. This explains one of the main causes for current tensions in the Taiwan Strait. Such tensions are driven by the PRC's domestic political agenda.
\nInternal political differences in China tend to become exaggerated and ignite domestic feuds since the PRC's decision-making process is not transparent, and its leadership selection and recruitment processes are still closed to institutional oversight, media scrutiny or popular participation. There are still no signs as to how soon people in China might be able to choose their own leaders, or even when the political system might be more responsive to public opinion. It can be expected, therefore, that Taiwan will continue to be used as a scapegoat for some time to come.
\nUnlike China, Taiwan embarked on the process of democratization in the late 1980s. This culminated in the first direct presidential election in 1996, and first peaceful transfer of power between political parties in 2000. The peaceful nature of these transformations has been recognized internationally as a tremendous political achievement.
\nMoreover, since Taiwan is a democracy, major policies must meet the approval of a majority of the people through legislative oversight and periodic elections. The public also reacts to cross-strait developments and international situations.
\nChina's diplomatic oppression of Taiwan, for example, has had a counterproductive effect that China did not foresee, with more than 50 percent of Taiwan's people now identifying themselves as Taiwanese rather than Chinese. This trend has been interpreted as evidence of Taiwan's desire for independence, however, and China does not seem to realize that the main force behind it has been the PRC's own hostile posture toward Taiwan.
\nMeanwhile, it continues to formulate policies that will merely encourage this trend and force Taiwan's people to conclude that China is afraid of Taiwan's democracy and its people's right to express their views.
\nTaiwan's democratization has many facets, and China would do well to pay closer attention to the results of public opinion surveys in Taiwan. Regarding future relations with China, for example, surveys asking whether people support independence, the status quo, or unification with China have consistently shown that between 70 and 80 percent of Taiwan's people opt for a broadly defined status quo.
\nIt is reasonable to conclude, therefore, that Taiwan's public opinion on cross-strait issues is one of the most important foundations of cross-strait stability.
\nPeople in Taiwan are beginning to wonder if it might be Taiwan's democracy that China objects to, rather than Taiwan independence per se. For China to better understand how Taiwan's people view the future of cross-strait relations, it should realize that most people -- 70 percent in a poll last July -- are sensitive to China's hostility toward the Taiwan government. This merely illustrates how China's Taiwan policies can be counterproductive to its stated policy goal of bringing Taiwan closer. If China does indeed want Taiwan's public to view it more favorably, it should act in a less threatening manner.
\nAnother misinterpretation by China concerns Taiwan's plans for constitutional revision, which is due to start early next year. The PRC has been announcing to the world that, if Taiwan goes ahead with constitutional revision, this could lead to war. The truth is, however, that Taiwan has a genuine need to revise its Constitution. The current Constitution was written in 1947 in China, and was designed for use in China. It has provisions for seven major branches of government, which are supposed to act as checks and balances of each another. This system is merely hypothetical and cannot function, as it differs completely from the realities of the existing political system.
\nFor example, due to the nature of Taiwan's electoral system, the public sees the legislative branch -- the Legislative Yuan -- as a key source of the nation's political problems. Taiwan has also been deliberating over whether elimination of provincial and village level governments would improve administrative efficiency. Other issues, such as voting age, military recruitment, economic regulation, Aboriginal peoples' rights, etc, all require constitutional revision if they are to be addressed properly.
\nProcedures for constitutional revision will follow those prescribed by the current Constitution. A Constitution Bill must first be adopted by a three-quarter majority of the Legislative Yuan. A National Assembly would then be elected according to proportional representation, and it too would need to approve the Legislative Yuan's bill by a three-quarter majority.
\nAs promised by Chen in his inauguration speech, issues relating to national sovereignty, such as the national title and national flag, will not be dealt with by the ruling party. The high thresholds required for this procedure should ensure that any radical proposals will be vetoed.
\nChina continues to threaten Taiwan over its intention to revise the Constitution as if the people of Taiwan do not have the right to an improved political system. This threat raises concern in the international community over whether constitutional revision by Taiwan constitutes a "unilateral change of the status quo."
\nActually, one could say that the better Taiwan's democracy functions, the more Chinese people -- whether in Hong Kong, China, or wherever -- can emulate it. Taiwan's democracy is, therefore, the best hope for all Chinese people the world over.
\nSince Taiwan is already a democracy and its people are willing to seek reconciliation with China, Taiwan's government would like to de-escalate regional tensions and bring the two sides of the Taiwan Strait together to create a cooperative mode by the following four stages.
\nIn the first stage, already underway, Taiwan is pursuing a conciliatory and open policy toward China, even if this requires unilateral gestures of goodwill. Taiwan's government has reviewed its cultural and economic exchange policies, and would like to expand the scope of these cross-strait interactions.
\nIn the second stage, Taiwan will pursue dialogue and negotiation with China on substantive issues, such as currency exchange, investment protection, avoidance of double taxation, legal arbitration, protection of intellectual property rights, tourism, repatriation of illegal immigrants, joint efforts to combat cross-strait crime and direct transportation links.
\nThrough negotiation of these substantive issues, Taiwan and China may slowly build confidence and gain each other's trust. When agreements on these issues are reached, the two sides will enter a new era of cooperation. At that stage the environment should be such that dialogue on more thorny political issues can begin.
\nIn the third stage, Taiwan will seek to establish an interim framework for peace and stability to govern the activities between the two sides before a final settlement can be found. The pursuit and maintenance of peace should be the paramount guideline within this framework so as to ensure that neither side resorts to extreme means to change the status quo.
\nThe two sides should pursue political negotiations according proper mechanisms, establishing appropriate political relations, carrying out military confidence building measures that will prevent any accidental incidents from erupting into major conflicts.
\nIn the fourth and final stage, the two sides will work out their political differences for a final settlement. Whatever form this takes, Taiwan should be able to maintain its self-rule without jeopardizing its democratic system. Taiwan should also be guaranteed the right to be a member of the international community and to participate in international bodies, such as the UN and its affiliated organizations. Taiwan does not exclude any form of political relationship with China, so long as Taiwan's democracy is recognized and the people agree to it.
\nEven before China has agreed to engage in the dialogue proposed in the second stage, Taiwan has already made unilateral efforts to hold out olive branches to China. For example, it has already allowed more journalists to be stationed in Taiwan, will soon allow Chinese actors to participate in Taiwan filmmaking, and is evaluating other policy measures that will improve cultural and economic exchanges.
\nRecently, Taiwan has strongly urged China to resume its dialogue with Taiwan since this will help achieve China's stated aim of bringing Taiwan closer rather than pushing it further away.
\nThe Taiwan Strait has been described by many as one of the most volatile areas in the world. Any military conflict will certainly bring devastating results to the region and, therefore, is not in anyone's interest. Since commencement of the administration's new term on May 20, it has spoken with prudence and acted with goodwill in trying to reconcile the differences with China.
\nThese efforts have been appreciated by the international community, and it is time that more followed the lead of those major nations which have urged the PRC to look more carefully at Taiwan's policies, actions, and intentions, and to resume dialogue with Taiwan.
\nThe international community should also remind China that peace and development should be the most important objectives in cross-strait relations, especially in light of the "peaceful rise" China has proclaimed as its national endeavor. As always, it takes two to make peace, and China should make a public proclamation that it will pursue peace in resolving its differences with Taiwan. Peace should color the language used by all parties concerned.
\nChina is a great nation with a long and proud history; its civilization has been glorious, not through conquering others but by accommodating them. China will continue to be a great power not by intimidating Taiwan but by accommodating and living peacefully with Taiwan. The reward for China to reach peace with Taiwan outweighs those of conflict or stalemate.
\nChina has wasted the four years of Chen's first term by not responding to Taiwan's repeated calls for meaningful dialogue. A widening of the distance between the two sides has certainly not benefited China's interest. Those in the international community who are concerned with cross-strait relations should remind China's leaders of this simple but important fact.
\nJoseph Wu (
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on