As expected, China's Taiwan Affairs Office severely attacked President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chen stressed in his speech that the two sides can "use the basis of the 1992 meeting in Hong Kong" to push for cross-strait talks. As he said, "In the future, Taiwan and China can seek to establish political relations in any form whatsoever. We would not exclude any possibility, so long as there is the consent of the 23 million people of Taiwan." By placing Taiwan and China side by side like this, it means that they are two equal sovereignties with a special relationship.
Basically, Chen's speech is a continuation of former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "special state-to-state relations" dictum. Beijing therefore criticized that he has "obstinately adhered to his separatist stance on `one country on each side' of the Taiwan Strait." In fact, if the possibility of independence is not excluded by Taiwan, any sweet talk from Taiwan's top leaders will hardly be accepted by the other side, which insists on the "one China" principle.
Although Chen failed to receive any goodwill from communist China in return, his discourse serves as a benchmark to the integration of disputes between the pro-unification and pro-independence camps in Taiwan. By showing maximum flexibility on the two countries' future political relations, he has covered other options -- not only independence, but also commonwealth, confederation, federation or even unification within a "one China" framework. This in fact represents most opinions of the Taiwanese people, proving that the president has already broken through the siege of the pro-independence dogmatists, and has returned to the relatively pragmatic "middle way" today.
According to the theory of philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the goal of such political integration is to consolidate people's "general will," or the collective will of a community that is the embodiment of its common interest. Thus, we must abandon the old ideology of "unification versus independence" or "loving Taiwan versus loving China."
We then have to analyze the cross-strait policies of each party, group, and individual to reach a shared consensus. Finally, we can shape the consensus as the public's general will to back the government during future talks.
Relations between Taiwan and China are much more complex than those between North and South Korea or East and West Germany. So it is more important for us to shape a general will. Chen mentioned in his speech that he plans to invite leaders from all political parties to establish a committee for cross-strait peace and development after the December legislative elections.
This is the correct direction, and the timing is also good. Lawmakers will have more legitimacy by that time. And people's election passions will have calmed down, which is conducive to rational dialogue. I suggest that the committee base its operation on the public's consensus, and replace conflicts by integration and negotiation in order to consolidate the public's general will.
For Taiwan, it is urgent to reach a consensus. As for China, I hereby call on its government to realize that, in light of the mature development of Taiwan's democratic politics, it cannot exclude any option for future cross-strait relations, even if the option is only supported by 1 percent or 2 percent of its people.
Beijing can certainly try to convince the Taiwanese people not to accept a specific option such as Taiwan's independence. But it cannot deny everything simply because that specific option still exists.
Shen Fu-hsiung is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US